Paper · 2004 · Guangxi nongye shengwu kexue

Studies on the effects of silicon,magnesium,boron fertilizer on yield and sugar yield of sugarcane

Wei Xiang-hua; Lu Shennian

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

After the fertilizers of silicon,magnesium,boron were applied in the soil with lower level of available silicon,magnesium and boron,the results indicated there were obvious different effects of silicon,magnesium,boron fertilizer and their different amount on height,diameter,brix,yield and sugar yield of sugarcane.Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicon fertilizer increased sugarcane brix from 0.42 to 1.11 compared with CK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
brixe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.42 to 1.11e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicon fertilizer increased sugarcane yield from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 compared with CK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicon fertilizer increased sugarcane theoretical sugar yield from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 compared with CK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
theoretical sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

magnesium fertilizer increased sugarcane brix from 0.93 to 1.26 compared with CK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
magnesium fertilizere0
Outcome
brixe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.93 to 1.26e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

magnesium fertilizer increased sugarcane yield from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 compared with CK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
magnesium fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

magnesium fertilizer increased sugarcane theoretical sugar yield from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 compared with CK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
magnesium fertilizere0
Outcome
theoretical sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

boron fertilizer increased sugarcane brix from 0.41 to 1.20 compared with CK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
boron fertilizere0
Outcome
brixe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.41 to 1.20e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

boron fertilizer increased sugarcane yield from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 compared with CK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
boron fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

boron fertilizer increased sugarcane theoretical sugar yield from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 compared with CK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
boron fertilizere0
Outcome
theoretical sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

magnesium atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

boron atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

magnesium atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

boron atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

104 papers: 91 positive, 13 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.