Intervention effectmodel-written summary

boron fertilizer increased sugarcane brix from 0.41 to 1.20 compared with CK.

A claim from Studies on the effects of silicon,magnesium,boron fertilizer on yield and sugar yield of sugarcane · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

boron fertilizer increased sugarcane brix from 0.41 to 1.20 compared with CK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
boron fertilizere0
Outcome
brixe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.41 to 1.20e0
Comparator
CKe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,the brix was increased from 0.42 to 1.11,the yield was increased from 11.04t/hm~2 to 14.96t/ hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 1.84 t/hm~2 to 2.10 t/hm~2 by the silicon fertilizer;the brix was increased from 0.93 to 1.26,the yield was increased from 4.02t/hm~2 to 9.55t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.99t/hm~2 to 1.53t/hm~2 by the magnesium fertilizer; the brix was increased from 0.41 to 1.20,the yield was increased from 5.00 t/hm~2 to 10.00 t/hm~2 and the theoretical sugar yield was increased from 0.80 t/hm~2 to 1.82 t/hm~2 by the boron fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–934
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98

Title

Studies on the effects of silicon,magnesium,boron fertilizer on yield and sugar yield of sugarcane

Wei Xiang-hua; Lu Shennian Guangxi nongye shengwu kexue 2004

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-d4aef9e2ef4f35085ba9fce9cdc5b965cbf5f9dd63f881505839d9322f57ef62 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

boron atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

104 papers: 91 positive, 13 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
    TSS content of sugarcane decreased with drip fertigation.

    Primary research of drip fertigation on sugarcane · 2008 · compared with traditional irrigation and soil application

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
  8. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.