Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of Soil and Foliar Applied Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Sugar Quality of Two Sugarcane Cultivars under Rainfed Conditions

J. Bamrungrai; A. Polthanee; B. Tubana; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: In north-eastern Thailand, sugarcane is planted normally in late rainy season wherein the plants may experience drought stress during its early growth stage in dry season and waterlogging stress during late growth stage at peak of rainy season. Hence, the objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of soil application alone and soil combined with foliar application of nutrients on growth, yield and sugar quality of sugarcane grown under rainfed conditions. Methods: The field experiment was conducted during November 2016 to December 2017. A split-plot design with three replications was laid out. The two sugarcane cultivars (KK3, K93-219) were assigned as main plots. The fertilizer application methods were assigned as sub-plots that comprised of four treatments: (1) soil applied NPK, (2) soil NPK + foliar N and K applied at 90 days after planting (DAP), (3) soil NPK + foliar N and K applied at 210 DAP and (4) soil NPK + foliar N and K applied at 90 and 210 DAP. Result: The soil NPK + foliar N and K applied at 90 and 210 DAP improved yield components and cane yield. The cultivar K93-219 produced significantly higher cane yield than KK3. The fertilizer application methods and cultivars had no significant effect on sugar quality such as brix (%), purity (%), polarity (%), fiber (%) and commercial cane sugar (CCS-%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil NPK plus foliar N and K at 90 and 210 DAP improved yield components and cane yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
soil NPK + foliar N and K applied at 90 and 210 DAPe0
Outcome
yield components and cane yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil NPK + foliar N and K applied at 90 and 210 DAP improved yield components and cane yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K93-219 produced significantly higher cane yield than KK3.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
K93-219e0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
KK3e0

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar K93-219 produced significantly higher cane yield than KK3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application methods and cultivars had no significant effect on sugar quality measures.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
fertilizer application methodse0
Outcome
brix (%), purity (%), polarity (%)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizer application methods and cultivars had no significant effect on sugar quality such as brix (%), purity (%), polarity (%), fiber (%) and commercial cane sugar (CCS-%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application methods and cultivars had no significant effect on fiber and commercial cane sugar.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
fertilizer application methodse0
Outcome
fiber (%) and commercial cane sugar (CCS-%)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizer application methods and cultivars had no significant effect on sugar quality such as brix (%), purity (%), polarity (%), fiber (%) and commercial cane sugar (CCS-%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

104 papers: 91 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 91 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Sulphur fertilizer could improve cane sugar and fibre content.

    Sulphur nutrient of sugarcane and balance of sulphur on soil. · 2008 · compared with without applied sulphur fertilizer treatment

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 65 positive, 7 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.