Abstract
With GT97-69 as tested material, using Li-Da bio-organic fertilizer and common fertilizer as tested fertilizer, setting the equivalent fertilizer treatments, effects of different fertilizer treatments on agronomic characters and process quality of sugarcane were studied. Results showed that compared with the treatment of using compound fertilizer, sugarcane applied by bio-organic fertilizer had the higher stem length, stem rate, millable canes, yield and contents of fibre and sucrose, but lower emergence rate, tiller rate and stalk diameter. As the aspects of promoting sugarcane extend, increasing millable canes, yield and the content of sugar, compared to the common fertilizer, application of bio-organic fertilizer had higher significant effect.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-organic fertilizer gave higher stem length, stem rate and millable canes than compound fertilizer.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane applied by bio-organic fertilizer had the higher stem length, stem rate, millable canes, yield and contents of fibre and sucrose, but lower emergence rate, tiller rate and stalk diameter”
t0“compound fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-organic fertilizer gave higher yield and fibre and sucrose contents than compound fertilizer.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane applied by bio-organic fertilizer had the higher stem length, stem rate, millable canes, yield and contents of fibre and sucrose, but lower emergence rate, tiller rate and stalk diameter”
t0“compound fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-organic fertilizer gave lower emergence rate, tiller rate and stalk diameter than compound fertilizer.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane applied by bio-organic fertilizer had the higher stem length, stem rate, millable canes, yield and contents of fibre and sucrose, but lower emergence rate, tiller rate and stalk diameter”
t0“compound fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-organic fertilizer significantly promoted sugarcane extension, millable canes, yield and sugar content relative to common fertilizer.
Verbatim
e0“compared to the common fertilizer, application of bio-organic fertilizer had higher significant effect”
e1“promoting sugarcane extend, increasing millable canes, yield and the content of sugar”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: grain · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.