Paper · 2009 · Xi'nan nongye xuebao

Effects of Sole Fertilization B,Mo,Zn and Combined Application on the Stem Yield and Quality of Sugarcane

Jiawen Guo; Zhang Yue-bin; Shaochun Liu; et al.

18
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of sole fertilized B,Mo,Zn and combined application on yield and quality of ROC10 was researched by using pot experiment.The result showed as follows,increasing application of boron could effectively raised stem yield,sucrose content,gravity purity and apparent purity.At the same time,it also decreased reducing sugar content and fiber content of sugarcane.Increasing application of Mo could obviously promoted stem yield,however,Yeducing sugar content and fiber content of sugarcaane was also increased.At the same time,gravity purity and apparent purity of sugarcane was reduced.Zn was favorable to increase stem yield and improve quality,but stimulation effect was less than that of Mo and the effect of improving quality less than B.Experiment also indicated that B,Mo,Zn combined application gained the highest stem yield.Cane yield was increased by 27.1 % compared with control group.B,Mo combined application was the best treatment which increased cane yield in all two elements combined application.Stem yield of B,Mo and B,Mo,Zn had no obvious difference.B,Mo,Zn and B,Mo gained the better effects on sugar content in all treatment,which increased by 26.16 %and 30.55 % compared with control group respectively.B,Zn obtained the lowest yield,its stem yield was far less than that of sole fertilized B and Zn.All treatment had the tendency of promoting stalk efficiency except sole fertilized B and Mo,Zn.Either sole element,or two and three element combined application,the effects of B,Mo,Zn interaction on stem diameter was not significant except B,Zn.Increased trace element had not obvious effects on stem height except Mo,Zn,its stem height was significantly lower than that of control group.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing boron raised sugarcane stem yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
increasing application of borone0
Outcome
stem yielde0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing application of boron could effectively raised stem yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing boron raised sucrose content, gravity purity and apparent purity.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
increasing application of borone0
Outcome
sucrose content,gravity purity and apparent puritye0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing application of boron could effectively raised stem yield,sucrose content,gravity purity and apparent purity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron decreased sugarcane reducing sugar and fiber content.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
reducing sugar content and fiber contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it also decreased reducing sugar content and fiber content of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Mo promoted stem yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Increasing application of Moe0
Outcome
stem yielde0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing application of Mo could obviously promoted stem yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo increased reducing sugar and fiber content.

Taxon
sugarcaanee0
Outcome
Yeducing sugar content and fiber contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yeducing sugar content and fiber content of sugarcaane was also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo reduced gravity and apparent purity.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
gravity purity and apparent puritye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“gravity purity and apparent purity of sugarcane was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn increased stem yield, with less stimulation than Mo.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
stem yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Moe0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Zn was favorable to increase stem yield and improve quality,but stimulation effect was less than that of Mo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn improved quality, with less effect than B.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
improvee0
Comparator
Be0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Zn was favorable to increase stem yield and improve quality,but stimulation effect was less than that of Mo and the effect of improving quality less than B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined B, Mo and Zn gave the highest stem yield, 27.1 % above control.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B,Mo,Zn combined applicatione0
Outcome
stem yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
27.1 %e0
Comparator
control groupe0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“B,Mo,Zn combined application gained the highest stem yield.Cane yield was increased by 27.1 % compared with control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B and Mo was the best two element combination for cane yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B,Mo combined applicatione0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
all two elements combined applicatione0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“B,Mo combined application was the best treatment which increased cane yield in all two elements combined application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B, Mo and Zn and B, Mo had no obvious stem yield difference.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B,Mo,Zne0
Outcome
Stem yielde0
Direction
no obvious differencee0
Comparator
B,Moe0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stem yield of B,Mo and B,Mo,Zn had no obvious difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B, Mo and Zn increased sugar content by 26.16 % versus control.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B,Mo,Zne0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.16 %e0
Comparator
control groupe0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“B,Mo,Zn and B,Mo gained the better effects on sugar content in all treatment,which increased by 26.16 %and 30.55 % compared with control group respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B and Mo increased sugar content by 30.55 % versus control.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B,Moe0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.55 %e0
Comparator
control groupe0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“B,Mo,Zn and B,Mo gained the better effects on sugar content in all treatment,which increased by 26.16 %and 30.55 % compared with control group respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B and Zn had the lowest stem yield, below sole B and Zn.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B,Zne0
Outcome
stem yielde0
Direction
far lesse0
Comparator
sole fertilized B and Zne0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“B,Zn obtained the lowest yield,its stem yield was far less than that of sole fertilized B and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments tended to promote stalk efficiency except sole B and Mo,Zn.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
All treatmente0
Outcome
stalk efficiencye0
Direction
promotinge0
Qualifier
except sole fertilized B and Mo,Zne0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“All treatment had the tendency of promoting stalk efficiency except sole fertilized B and Mo,Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B, Mo and Zn interactions had no significant stem diameter effect except B,Zn.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B,Mo,Zn interactione0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Qualifier
except B,Zne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“the effects of B,Mo,Zn interaction on stem diameter was not significant except B,Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most trace element additions had no obvious stem height effect, except Mo,Zn.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Increased trace elemente0
Outcome
stem heighte0
Direction
not obvious effectse0
Qualifier
except Mo,Zne0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increased trace element had not obvious effects on stem height except Mo,Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo,Zn significantly lowered stem height versus control.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Mo,Zne0
Outcome
stem heighte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control groupe0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mo,Zn,its stem height was significantly lower than that of control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1720 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

zinc atom · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

molybdenum atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

boron atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.