Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of bio-compost and zinc application on sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex) productivity, quality and soil health

C.K. JHA; S.K. SINHA; M. ALAM; et al.

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 200912 at Pusa, Bihar to study the effect of bio-compost and zinc (Zn) levels on productivity, quality and soil health of BO 137 spring sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid com- plex) grown in Calciorthent, rich in free calcium carbonate. Application of recommended dose fertilizer (RDF) along with bio-compost and graded levels of Zn (2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 kg/ha) significantly increased cane length, single cane weight, number of tillers and millable canes over the control. Combination of 100% NPK along with bio-compost @ 20 t/ha and 10 kg Zn/ha resulted in the highest cane yield (83.73 t/ha) and sugar yield (10.13 t/ha), being at par with treatment receiving RDF along with bio-compost either 5.0 or 7.5 kg Zn /ha but significantly supe- rior to plots treated with organic/inorganic only. Application of 100% NPK + bio-compost @ 20 t/ha + 7.5 Zn kg/ha was found optimum for getting higher cane/sugar yield and substituting 25% Zn sulphate in sugarcane production system. Brix and sucrose per cent of juice increased significantly with the bio-compost either alone or in combina- tion with inorganic fertilizer. The uptake of nutrients followed the similar trend as cane yield. The addition of or- ganic manure was found beneficial on Zn uptake in particular, Fe, Mn and Cu in general. Application of bio-com- post alone or in combination with inorganic fertilizer resulted in significant reduced pH, but increase in electrical conductivity, organic carbon and available macro and micronutrients content of post-harvest soil. Organic carbon content of post-harvest soil increased by 29.6% in bio-compost treated plot. Bio-compost addition significantly re- duced bulk density (0.09 to 0.17 units) from control. Increase in water infiltration rate, hydraulic conductivity and soil aggregates and decrease in bulk density were observed, indicating significant improvement in physical condi- tion of post-harvest soil. The hydraulic conductivity ranged from 0.19 to 0.24 cm/hr and water infiltration rate from 0.22 to 0.36 cm/hr. However, addition of inorganic fertilizer alone showed net negative balance of available nutri- ents and deterioration in physical condition of soil compared with initial value.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer with bio-compost and zinc significantly increased cane length, weight, tillers and millable canes over control.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
recommended dose fertilizer (RDF) along with bio-compost and graded levels of Zn (2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
cane length, single cane weight, number of tillers and millable canese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of recommended dose fertilizer (RDF) along with bio-compost and graded levels of Zn (2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 kg/ha) significantly increased cane length, single cane weight, number of tillers and millable canes over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–513 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK, compost and 10 kg Zn/ha combination produced highest cane yield of 83.73 t/ha.

Treatment
100% NPK along with bio-compost @ 20 t/ha and 10 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
83.73 t/hae0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Combination of 100% NPK along with bio-compost @ 20 t/ha and 10 kg Zn/ha resulted in the highest cane yield (83.73 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK, compost and 10 kg Zn/ha combination produced highest sugar yield of 10.13 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
100% NPK along with bio-compost @ 20 t/ha and 10 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.13 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Combination of 100% NPK along with bio-compost @ 20 t/ha and 10 kg Zn/ha resulted in the highest cane yield (83.73 t/ha) and sugar yield (10.13 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield treatment was at par with RDF plus compost and 5.0 or 7.5 kg Zn/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
at pare0
Comparator
treatment receiving RDF along with bio-compost either 5.0 or 7.5 kg Zn /hae0

Verbatim

e0

“being at par with treatment receiving RDF along with bio-compost either 5.0 or 7.5 kg Zn /ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–758 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield treatment significantly exceeded organic or inorganic fertilizer alone.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
100% NPK along with bio-compost @ 20 t/ha and 10 kg Zn/hae1
Outcome
supe- riore0
Direction
supe- riore0
Comparator
plots treated with organic/inorganic onlye0

Verbatim

e0

“significantly supe- rior to plots treated with organic/inorganic only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% NPK along with bio-compost @ 20 t/ha and 10 kg Zn/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–587 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identify 100% NPK plus compost and 7.5 Zn kg/ha as optimum for higher cane and sugar yields and 25% Zn sulphate substitution.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
100% NPK + bio-compost @ 20 t/ha + 7.5 Zn kg/hae0
Value
25%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% NPK + bio-compost @ 20 t/ha + 7.5 Zn kg/ha was found optimum for getting higher cane/sugar yield and substituting 25% Zn sulphate in sugarcane production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-compost alone or with inorganic fertilizer significantly increased juice Brix and sucrose percentage.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
bio-compost either alone or in combina- tion with inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
Brix and sucrose per cent of juicee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Brix and sucrose per cent of juice increased significantly with the bio-compost either alone or in combina- tion with inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1154 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake followed the same trend as cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
uptake of nutrientse0
Comparator
cane yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of nutrients followed the similar trend as cane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1220 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure benefited Zn uptake.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
or- ganic manuree0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of or- ganic manure was found beneficial on Zn uptake in particular, Fe, Mn and Cu in general”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1328 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure benefited Fe, Mn and Cu uptake.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
or- ganic manuree0
Outcome
Fe, Mn and Cue0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of or- ganic manure was found beneficial on Zn uptake in particular, Fe, Mn and Cu in general”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1328 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-compost significantly reduced postharvest soil pH.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
bio-com- post alone or in combination with inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bio-com- post alone or in combination with inorganic fertilizer resulted in significant reduced pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1443 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-compost increased postharvest soil electrical conductivity, organic carbon and available nutrients.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
bio-com- post alone or in combination with inorganic fertilizere1
Outcome
electrical conductivity, organic carbon and available macro and micronutrients content of post-harvest soile0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increase in electrical conductivity, organic carbon and available macro and micronutrients content of post-harvest soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1568 · show in text ↑
e1

“bio-com- post alone or in combination with inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1408 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-compost increased postharvest soil organic carbon by 29.6%.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
bio-composte0
Outcome
Organic carbon content of post-harvest soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Organic carbon content of post-harvest soil increased by 29.6% in bio-compost treated plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-compost significantly reduced soil bulk density by 0.09 to 0.17 units from control.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Bio-composte0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
re- ducede0
Value
0.09 to 0.17 unitse0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Bio-compost addition significantly re- duced bulk density (0.09 to 0.17 units) from control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1753 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-compost increased water infiltration, hydraulic conductivity and soil aggregates.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
Bio-composte1
Outcome
water infiltration rate, hydraulic conductivity and soil aggregatese0
Direction
Increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in water infiltration rate, hydraulic conductivity and soil aggregates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1834 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bio-compost addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1682 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydraulic conductivity ranged from 0.19 to 0.24 cm/hr.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
hydraulic conductivitye0
Value
0.19 to 0.24 cm/hre0

Verbatim

e0

“hydraulic conductivity ranged from 0.19 to 0.24 cm/hr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1964–2017 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water infiltration rate ranged from 0.22 to 0.36 cm/hr.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
water infiltration ratee0
Value
0.22 to 0.36 cm/hre0

Verbatim

e0

“water infiltration rate from 0.22 to 0.36 cm/hr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2069 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer alone caused a negative nutrient balance and deterioration of soil physical condition against initial values.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
inorganic fertilizer alonee0
Outcome
net negative balance of available nutri- ents and deterioration in physical condition of soile0
Direction
deterioratione0
Comparator
initial valuee0

Verbatim

e0

“addition of inorganic fertilizer alone showed net negative balance of available nutri- ents and deterioration in physical condition of soil compared with initial value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2080–2247 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–90 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

104 papers: 91 positive, 13 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.