Abstract
The tested sugarcane variety ROC22 were planted in latosolic red soil developed from sand shale,and medium and micro elements of Ca,Mg,B,Mo,Cu,Zn and Fe were alone or combinedly applied in the soil.The results showed that single application of Ca,Mg,B and Mo fertilizer showed obvious effect on increasing the yield of sugarcane with a better economic benefit,while Fe,Zn and Cu fertilizers showed negative effect.The effect of combined application of B,Mo,Mg and Ca each other on increasing the yield or sugar content of sugarcane was not better than that of single application of them.Therefore,it suggested that B,Mo,Mg and Ca fertilizer should be applied alone in sugarcane in latored soil to decrease,the cost of production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Single application of Ca, Mg, B or Mo fertiliser clearly increased sugarcane yield, with better economic benefit.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee1
- Treatment
- single application of Ca,Mg,B and Mo fertilizere1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasinge1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“single application of Ca,Mg,B and Mo fertilizer showed obvious effect on increasing the yield of sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Fe, Zn and Cu fertilisers had a negative effect on sugarcane.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Fe,Zn and Cu fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- negative effecte1
- Direction
- negative effecte1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“while Fe,Zn and Cu fertilizers showed negative effect”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined application of B, Mo, Mg and Ca was not better than single application of each for increasing sugarcane yield or sugar content.
Verbatim
e1“The effect of combined application of B,Mo,Mg and Ca each other on increasing the yield or sugar content of sugarcane was not better than that of single application of them”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that B, Mo, Mg and Ca fertiliser should be applied alone to sugarcane in latosolic red soil to lower production cost.
Verbatim
e1“B,Mo,Mg and Ca fertilizer should be applied alone in sugarcane in latored soil to decrease,the cost of production”
The same questions in other papers
magnesium atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →calcium atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
molybdenum atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →calcium atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →magnesium atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →molybdenum atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.