Abstract
In order to explore the effective way to gain the highest stem yield and best quality of sugarcane,the influence of Cu fertilizer combined application with Zn,B,Mo on the stem yield and quality of ROC22 was researched in this paper.Sugarcane was used as the experimental materials,field plot experiment and different processing was set up to analyze the influence of Cu and Zn,B,Mo fertilizer combined application on the stem yield and quality of ROC22.The result showed as follows,the stem yield was the highest in the treatment that Cu,Zn,B,Mo,four kinds of microelement fertilizer combined,an increase of 27.6% compared with the control,at 1% significant difference level,sugar content was increased by 7.36%,at 5% significant difference level and could effectively raised gravity purity.In the treatments of Cu combined with any one kind of microelement fertilizer of Zn,B,Mo,the yield in the treatment that Cu and Mo combined increased significantly,an increase of 16.8% compared with the control,at 1% significant difference level,but the effects of increased sugar content was not significant.In the treatment that Cu and B combined,the effects of increased all the stem yield and sugar content were not significant.The effect was the worst that Cu and Zn combined,even the stem yield was lower than just using Cu fertilizer.In the treatments of Cu combined with any two kinds of microelement fertilizer of Zn,B,Mo,the effects of increased yield and sugar content in both of the treatments that Cu,B,Mo combined and Cu,Zn,Mo combined were significant,at 5% significant difference level.the stem yield was increased by 14.6% and 12.1% respectively,and sugar content was increased by 8.23% and 5.95% respectively,the effects of increased sugar content in the treatments that Cu,B,Mo combined was significant,but the effects of increased yield was not significant.In each treatment,the effects of both increased stem yield and sugar content were the most significant in the treatment of four kinds of Cu,Zn,B,Mo microelement fertilizer combined.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Cu, Zn, B and Mo combined increased stem yield 27.6% over control.
Verbatim
e0“the stem yield was the highest in the treatment that Cu,Zn,B,Mo,four kinds of microelement fertilizer combined,an increase of 27.6% compared with the control,at 1% significant difference level”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu, Zn, B and Mo combined increased sugar content 7.36%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“sugar content was increased by 7.36%,at 5% significant difference level”
t0“sugarcane”
e1“the stem yield was the highest in the treatment that Cu,Zn,B,Mo,four kinds of microelement fertilizer combined”
Claim · model-written summary
The four fertilizer combination raised gravity purity.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“and could effectively raised gravity purity”
t0“sugarcane”
e1“the stem yield was the highest in the treatment that Cu,Zn,B,Mo,four kinds of microelement fertilizer combined”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu and Mo increased yield 16.8% over control.
Verbatim
e0“Cu and Mo combined increased significantly,an increase of 16.8% compared with the control,at 1% significant difference level”
t0“sugarcane”
e1“the yield in the treatment that Cu and Mo combined increased significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu and Mo did not significantly increase sugar content.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the effects of increased sugar content was not significant”
t0“sugarcane”
e1“the yield in the treatment that Cu and Mo combined increased significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu and B did not significantly increase stem yield.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“In the treatment that Cu and B combined,the effects of increased all the stem yield and sugar content were not significant”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu and B did not significantly increase sugar content.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“In the treatment that Cu and B combined,the effects of increased all the stem yield and sugar content were not significant”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu and Zn produced lower stem yield than Cu alone.
Verbatim
e0“Cu and Zn combined,even the stem yield was lower than just using Cu fertilizer”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu, B and Mo increased stem yield 14.6%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the stem yield was increased by 14.6% and 12.1% respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
e1“the treatments that Cu,B,Mo combined and Cu,Zn,Mo combined were significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu, Zn and Mo increased stem yield 12.1%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the stem yield was increased by 14.6% and 12.1% respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
e1“the treatments that Cu,B,Mo combined and Cu,Zn,Mo combined were significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu, B and Mo increased sugar content 8.23%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“sugar content was increased by 8.23% and 5.95% respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
e1“the treatments that Cu,B,Mo combined and Cu,Zn,Mo combined were significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu, Zn and Mo increased sugar content 5.95%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“sugar content was increased by 8.23% and 5.95% respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
e1“the treatments that Cu,B,Mo combined and Cu,Zn,Mo combined were significant”
The same questions in other papers
molybdenum atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →copper atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →zinc atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →copper atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
molybdenum atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.