Paper · 2021 · Scientific Reports

Water deficit modifies C:N:P stoichiometry affecting sugarcane and energy cane yield and its relationships with silicon supply

Antonio Santana Batista de Oliveira Filho; Renato de Mello Prado; Gelza Carliane Marques Teixeira; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Climate change has increased the occurrence of water deficit in regions where sugarcane and energy cane are cultivated, jeopardizing dry matter production of stems. It was hypothesized that the reasons behind this fact relate to C:N:P stoichiometric modifications in these species that impair the conversion rates of accumulated nutrients in the stems, which could be attenuated by supplying silicon (Si) to the crops. Thus, the aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of water deficit in sugarcane and energy cane ratoons in the presence and absence of Si, in the C:N:P stoichiometry of stems, in the use efficiency of these nutrients and in the accumulation of dry matter in stems. Two experiments were carried out, using sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum ) and energy cane ( S. spontaneum ), cultivated in pots filled with a Typic Quartzipisamment. The treatments for both experiments were arranged in a factorial scheme 2 × 2, without (70% of the soil’s water retention capacity) and with (30% of the capacity) water deficit, without and with the application of Si via fertirrigation, associated with foliar pulverization, both at a concentration of 2.5 mmol L −1 , arranged in randomized blocks. The reduction in dry matter production of stems in both species caused by water deficit was due to modifications of the C, N and P stoichiometric homeostasis, but the benefit of Si in these plants when increasing dry matter production was not a reflection of the change in homeostasis, thus it may be involved in other mechanisms that remain unknown and should be further studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced stem dry matter production in both sugarcane and energy cane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
water deficite2
Outcome
dry matter production of stemse2
Direction
reductione2
Comparator
70% of the soil’s water retention capacitye1

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum ) and energy cane ( S. spontaneum ), cultivated in pots filled with a Typic Quartzipisamment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–867 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatments for both experiments were arranged in a factorial scheme 2 × 2, without (70% of the soil’s water retention capacity) and with (30% of the capacity) water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1045 · show in text ↑
e2

“The reduction in dry matter production of stems in both species caused by water deficit was due to modifications of the C, N and P stoichiometric homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1375 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The stem dry matter reduction under water deficit was attributed to changes in C, N and P stoichiometric homeostasis.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
dry matter production of stemse2
Qualifier
C, N and P stoichiometric homeostasise2

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum ) and energy cane ( S. spontaneum ), cultivated in pots filled with a Typic Quartzipisamment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“The reduction in dry matter production of stems in both species caused by water deficit was due to modifications of the C, N and P stoichiometric homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply via fertirrigation increased stem dry matter production in sugarcane and energy cane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
application of Si via fertirrigatione4
Outcome
dry matter productione3
Direction
increasinge3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum ) and energy cane ( S. spontaneum ), cultivated in pots filled with a Typic Quartzipisamment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–867 · show in text ↑
e3

“the benefit of Si in these plants when increasing dry matter production was not a reflection of the change in homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1502 · show in text ↑
e4

“without and with the application of Si via fertirrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The silicon benefit to dry matter was not a reflection of a change in C:N:P homeostasis.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
the change in homeostasise3
Qualifier
not a reflection ofe3

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum ) and energy cane ( S. spontaneum ), cultivated in pots filled with a Typic Quartzipisamment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–867 · show in text ↑
e3

“the benefit of Si in these plants when increasing dry matter production was not a reflection of the change in homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1502 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

drought · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 4 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.