Paper · 2011 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Optimum Fertilization Model between Silicon and Phosphorus on Yield and Quality of Sugarcane in Lateritic Red Earth Area of Guangxi

Jiang Ze-pu

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The aim was to study the effects of optimum fertilization model between silicon and phosphorus on yield and quality of sugarcane in Lateritic Red Earth Area of Guangxi,to provide a scientific basis for establishing a high value and ecological cultivation of sugarcane in Guangxi.[Method] A field experiment was carried out by the quadratic regression D-optimal design in Long'an county,Guangxi.The polynomial regression models of fertilizers application and quadratic of two factors were established by using SAS statistical analysis software,and optimum nutrient simulation models of sugarcane were obtained by computer processing in seeking the best ratio of silicon and phosphorus for sugarcane nutrition.[Result] The results showed that combined application of silicon and phosphorus fertilizer contributed to tillering and growth of sugarcane.And in this condition of experiment,it showed some good characters with more productive stem,higher yield and better quality of sugarcane.The regression models of stem yield(Y),sugar yield(SY) and P(X_1),Si(X_2) were established by using SAS statistical analysis software,which were Y=110 096.92+4 356.91X_1+2 007.65X_2-1 592.35X_1X_2-5 461.33X2_1-7 442.09X2_2,R=0.914;SY=16 471.85+903.65X_1+424.26X_2-99.02X_1X_2-1 170.08X2_1-1 256.96X2_2,R=0.930,respectively.The regression mathematics models of sugarcane yield and sugar yield were better fitting with actual situation in the locality,and have higher practical value,so it can be used for fertilizer decision and forecast.The optimizing nutrition model of yield and sugar yield were acquired via computer optimization,respectively.when the dosage of phosphorus and silicon were 281.3 kg(P_2O_5)/hm2 and 405.0 kg(SiO_2)/ hm2(P_2O_5∶SiO_2 =1∶1.44),respectively,the sugarcane yield and sugar yield were 109 405.6 and 16 682.3 kg/hm2.[Conclusion] The best combination between silicon and phosphorus of sugarcane,suitable to soil condition in Lateritic Red Earth Area of Guangxi,was 281.3 kg(P_2O_5)/hm2 and 405.0 kg(SiO_2)/ hm2(P_2O_5∶SiO_2 =1∶1.44).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined silicon and phosphorus fertilization promoted sugarcane tillering and growth.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
combined application of silicon and phosphorus fertilizere0
Outcome
tillering and growthe0
Direction
contributed toe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of silicon and phosphorus fertilizer contributed to tillering and growth of sugarcane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilization produced more productive sugarcane stems.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
silicon and phosphorust0
Outcome
productive steme0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it showed some good characters with more productive stem,higher yield and better quality of sugarcane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silicon and Phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilization increased sugarcane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
silicon and phosphorust0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it showed some good characters with more productive stem,higher yield and better quality of sugarcane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“silicon and phosphorus”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilization improved sugarcane quality.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
silicon and phosphorust0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it showed some good characters with more productive stem,higher yield and better quality of sugarcane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“silicon and phosphorus”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stem yield regression model had R=0.914.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
stem yielde0
Value
R=0.914e0

Verbatim

e0

“The regression models of stem yield(Y),sugar yield(SY) and P(X_1),Si(X_2) were established by using SAS statistical analysis software,which were Y=110 096.92+4 356.91X_1+2 007.65X_2-1 592.35X_1X_2-5 461.33X2_1-7 442.09X2_2,R=0.914;SY=16 471.85+903.65X_1+424.26X_2-99.02X_1X_2-1 170.08X2_1-1 256.96X2_2,R=0.930,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 94–103 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sugar yield regression model had R=0.930.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Value
R=0.930e0

Verbatim

e0

“The regression models of stem yield(Y),sugar yield(SY) and P(X_1),Si(X_2) were established by using SAS statistical analysis software,which were Y=110 096.92+4 356.91X_1+2 007.65X_2-1 592.35X_1X_2-5 461.33X2_1-7 442.09X2_2,R=0.914;SY=16 471.85+903.65X_1+424.26X_2-99.02X_1X_2-1 170.08X2_1-1 256.96X2_2,R=0.930,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 94–103 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found the yield models fit local conditions and could support fertilizer decisions and forecasts.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
better fitting with actual situation in the localitye0
Comparator
actual situation in the localitye0

Verbatim

e0

“The regression mathematics models of sugarcane yield and sugar yield were better fitting with actual situation in the locality,and have higher practical value,so it can be used for fertilizer decision and forecast.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The optimized fertilizer doses projected sugarcane yield of 109 405.6 kg/hm2.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
281.3 kg(P_2O_5)/hm2 and 405.0 kg(SiO_2)/ hm2e0
Outcome
sugarcane yielde0
Value
109 405.6e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“when the dosage of phosphorus and silicon were 281.3 kg(P_2O_5)/hm2 and 405.0 kg(SiO_2)/ hm2(P_2O_5∶SiO_2 =1∶1.44),respectively,the sugarcane yield and sugar yield were 109 405.6 and 16 682.3 kg/hm2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1843 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The optimized fertilizer doses projected sugar yield of 16 682.3 kg/hm2.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Value
16 682.3 kg/hm2e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“when the dosage of phosphorus and silicon were 281.3 kg(P_2O_5)/hm2 and 405.0 kg(SiO_2)/ hm2(P_2O_5∶SiO_2 =1∶1.44),respectively,the sugarcane yield and sugar yield were 109 405.6 and 16 682.3 kg/hm2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1843 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 281.3 kg phosphorus and 405.0 kg silicon fertilizer per hectare for this Guangxi soil.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
281.3 kg(P_2O_5)/hm2 and 405.0 kg(SiO_2)/ hm2e0
Outcome
best combination between silicon and phosphoruse0
Setting
Lateritic Red Earth Area of Guangxie0

Verbatim

e0

“The best combination between silicon and phosphorus of sugarcane,suitable to soil condition in Lateritic Red Earth Area of Guangxi,was 281.3 kg(P_2O_5)/hm2 and 405.0 kg(SiO_2)/ hm2(P_2O_5∶SiO_2 =1∶1.44).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–2059 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

phosphorus · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 55 positive, 2 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.