Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

EFFECTS OF SILICON ON YIELD CONTRIBUTING PARAMETERS AND ITS ACCUMULATION IN ABAXIAL EPIDERMIS OF SUGARCANE LEAF BLADES USING ENERGY DISPERSIVE X-RAY ANALYSIS

S. M. Bokhtiar; Hai-Rong Huang; Yang-Rui Li; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Effects of silicon (Si), supplied as calcium silicate (Ca-silicate) fertilizer on yield contributing parameters in sugarcane like chlorophyll content, gas exchange characteristics, leaf nutrient concentrations and its effects on soil fertility were evaluated. Seven rates of Ca-silicate (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 120 and 150 g pot−1) were applied with traditional fertilizers and plants were grown in a greenhouse. The added Ca-silicate increased photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance significantly over the non-amended treatment. Leaf tissue contents of phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and sodium (Na) did not differ remarkably. With increasing silicate application, iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn) contents significantly decreased in both leaf tissue and soil contents. Si amended treatments significantly increased yield in dry matter (26 to 70%) and in cane yield (30 to 66%) per pot over non-amended. The Si content up to 2.64% per dry mass was found in top visible dewlap (TVD) leaf tissues when amended with Ca-silicate fertilizer in our 12 months study. Soil pH, soil Si, and leaf tissues silicon content progressively increased with increasing rate of Ca-silicate. The available S, exchangeable potassium (K), Na, Ca and Mg increased more or less progressively as rate of Si application increased over non-amended. Nevertheless, the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDAX) revealed that different rates of Ca-silicate responded differently in accumulation of Si and other elements in epidermal cells, silica cells and stomata cells. Keywords: leaf nutrientsoil fertilitychlorophyllgas exchange characteristicsscanning electron microscopeenergy dispersive X-ray analysis ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors are gratefully acknowledged to Mei Hua Yu and Jing Xian Wen, the department of Physics, Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004,China for operating the scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray analyzer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium silicate significantly increased photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Ca-silicatee0
Outcome
photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-amended treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The added Ca-silicate increased photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance significantly over the non-amended treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf P, S and Ca contents did not differ remarkably.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Ca-silicatee1
Outcome
phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), calcium (Ca)e0
Direction
did not differ remarkablye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf tissue contents of phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and sodium (Na) did not differ remarkably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“The added Ca-silicate increased photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance significantly over the non-amended treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Mg and Na contents did not differ remarkably.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Ca-silicatee1
Outcome
magnesium (Mg) and sodium (Na)e0
Direction
did not differ remarkablye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf tissue contents of phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and sodium (Na) did not differ remarkably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“The added Ca-silicate increased photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance significantly over the non-amended treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing silicate significantly reduced Fe, Cu and Zn in leaves and soil.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
increasing silicate applicatione0
Outcome
iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing silicate application, iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn) contents significantly decreased in both leaf tissue and soil contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing silicate significantly reduced Mn in leaves and soil.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
increasing silicate applicatione0
Outcome
manganese (Mn) contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing silicate application, iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn) contents significantly decreased in both leaf tissue and soil contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon amendment increased dry matter yield by 26 to 70%.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Si amended treatmentse0
Outcome
yield in dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26 to 70%e0
Comparator
non-amendede0

Verbatim

e0

“Si amended treatments significantly increased yield in dry matter (26 to 70%) and in cane yield (30 to 66%) per pot over non-amended.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon amendment increased cane yield by 30 to 66% per pot.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
Si amended treatmentse0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30 to 66%e0
Comparator
non-amendede0

Verbatim

e0

“Si amended treatments significantly increased yield in dry matter (26 to 70%) and in cane yield (30 to 66%) per pot over non-amended.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top visible dewlap leaves contained up to 2.64% silicon on a dry-mass basis after calcium silicate amendment.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Organ / stage
top visible dewlap (TVD) leaf tissuese0
Treatment
Ca-silicate fertilizere0
Outcome
Si contente0
Value
2.64% per dry masse0

Verbatim

e0

“The Si content up to 2.64% per dry mass was found in top visible dewlap (TVD) leaf tissues when amended with Ca-silicate fertilizer in our 12 months study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH, soil silicon and leaf silicon increased with calcium silicate rate.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
increasing rate of Ca-silicatee0
Outcome
Soil pH, soil Si, and leaf tissues silicon contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH, soil Si, and leaf tissues silicon content progressively increased with increasing rate of Ca-silicate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil S and exchangeable K and Na increased with silicon application rate.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
rate of Si applicatione0
Outcome
available S, exchangeable potassium (K), Nae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-amendede0

Verbatim

e0

“The available S, exchangeable potassium (K), Na, Ca and Mg increased more or less progressively as rate of Si application increased over non-amended.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable soil Ca and Mg increased with silicon application rate.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
rate of Si applicatione0
Outcome
Ca and Mge0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-amendede0

Verbatim

e0

“The available S, exchangeable potassium (K), Na, Ca and Mg increased more or less progressively as rate of Si application increased over non-amended.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium silicate rates differed in elemental accumulation in epidermal, silica and stomatal cells.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
different rates of Ca-silicatee0
Outcome
accumulation of Si and other elements in epidermal cells, silica cells and stomata cellse0
Direction
differentlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“different rates of Ca-silicate responded differently in accumulation of Si and other elements in epidermal cells, silica cells and stomata cells.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.