Paper · 2021 · Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration

Assessing climate change impacts on crops by adopting a set of crop performance indicators

M. Moriondo; M. Bindi; L. Brilli; et al.

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The impact of climate change on the agricultural systems of three major islands in the Mediterranean basin, namely Sicily, Crete and Cyprus, was evaluated using a suite of specifically calibrated crop models and the outputs of a regional circulation model for Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 downscaled to 12 km of resolution and tested for its effectiveness in reproducing the local meteorological data. The most important annual (wheat, barley, tomato and potato) and perennial (grapevine and olive tree) crops were selected to represent the agricultural systems of the islands. The same modelling framework was used to test the effectiveness of autonomous adaptation options, such as shifting sowing date and the use of varieties with different growing season length. The results highlighted that, on average, warmer temperatures advanced both anthesis and maturity of the selected crops, but at different magnitudes depending on the crop and the island. Winter crops (barley, wheat and potato) experienced the lowest impact in terms of yield loss with respect to the baseline, with even some positive effects, especially in Sicily where both wheat and barley showed a general increase of 9% as compared to the baseline, while potato increased up to + 17%. Amongst perennial crops, olive tree showed low variation under RCP 4.5, but on average increased by 7% under RCP 8.5 on the three islands. Climate change had a detrimental effect specifically on tomato (− 2% on average in RCP 8.5 and 4.5 on the three islands) and grapevine (− 7%). The use of different sowing dates, or different varieties, revealed that for winter crops early autumn sowing is still the best option for producing wheat and barley in future periods on the three islands under both future scenarios. For tomato and potato, advancing sowing date to early winter is a winning strategy that may even increase final yield (+ 9% for tomato and + 17% for potato, on average). For grapevine, the use of late varieties, while suffering the most from increasing temperatures and reduced rainfall (− 15%, on average), is still a valuable option to keep high yield levels with respect to earlier varieties, which even if showing some increases with respect to the baseline have a generally much lower production level. The same may be applied to olive tree although the production differences between late and early varieties are less evident and climate change exerts a favourable influence (+ 4 and + 3% for early and late varieties, respectively).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Warmer temperatures advanced anthesis across the selected crops, with crop and island differences.

Outcome
anthesise0
Direction
advancede0
Qualifier
different magnitudes depending on the crop and the islande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“warmer temperatures advanced both anthesis and maturity of the selected crops, but at different magnitudes depending on the crop and the island.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, barley, tomato and potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Warmer temperatures advanced crop maturity, with crop and island differences.

Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
advancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“warmer temperatures advanced both anthesis and maturity of the selected crops, but at different magnitudes depending on the crop and the island.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, barley, tomato and potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Winter crops had the lowest projected yield-loss impact relative to baseline.

Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
the baselinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter crops (barley, wheat and potato) experienced the lowest impact in terms of yield loss with respect to the baseline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield in Sicily generally increased by 9% relative to baseline.

Outcome
yieldt0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
the baselinee0
Setting
Sicilye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Sicily where both wheat and barley showed a general increase of 9% as compared to the baseline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1082 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Barley yield in Sicily generally increased by 9% relative to baseline.

Outcome
yieldt0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
the baselinee0
Setting
Sicilye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Sicily where both wheat and barley showed a general increase of 9% as compared to the baseline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1082 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yield in Sicily increased up to 17%.

Outcome
yield losst0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+ 17%e0
Setting
Sicilye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while potato increased up to + 17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“especially in Sicily”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Olive tree yield varied little under RCP 4.5.

Taxon
olive treeOlea europaeae0
Outcome
low variatione0
Qualifier
RCP 4.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive tree showed low variation under RCP 4.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1362 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Olive tree yield increased by 7% on average across the islands under RCP 8.5.

Taxon
olive treeOlea europaeae1
Outcome
yield losst0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7%e0
Qualifier
RCP 8.5 on the three islandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on average increased by 7% under RCP 8.5 on the three islands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“olive tree showed low variation under RCP 4.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1362 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield declined by 2% on average across the islands under both scenarios.

Outcome
yield losst0
Value
− 2%e0
Qualifier
RCP 8.5 and 4.5 on the three islandse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (− 2% on average in RCP 8.5 and 4.5 on the three islands)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1082 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Grapevine yield declined by 7% under climate change.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Outcome
yield losst0
Value
− 7%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grapevine (− 7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1082 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early autumn sowing was judged best for future wheat production on all three islands.

Outcome
early autumn sowing is still the best optione0
Qualifier
in future periods on the three islands under both future scenariose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early autumn sowing is still the best option for producing wheat and barley in future periods on the three islands under both future scenarios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1807 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early autumn sowing was judged best for future barley production on all three islands.

Outcome
early autumn sowing is still the best optione0
Qualifier
in future periods on the three islands under both future scenariose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early autumn sowing is still the best option for producing wheat and barley in future periods on the three islands under both future scenarios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Advancing tomato sowing to early winter may increase final yield by 9% on average.

Treatment
advancing sowing date to early wintere0
Outcome
final yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
+ 9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For tomato and potato, advancing sowing date to early winter is a winning strategy that may even increase final yield (+ 9% for tomato and + 17% for potato, on average).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Advancing potato sowing to early winter may increase final yield by 17% on average.

Treatment
advancing sowing date to early wintere0
Outcome
final yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
+ 17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For tomato and potato, advancing sowing date to early winter is a winning strategy that may even increase final yield (+ 9% for tomato and + 17% for potato, on average).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1977 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Late grapevine varieties suffered a 15% yield decline on average under increasing temperature and reduced rainfall.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Material
late varietiese0
Outcome
yield losst0
Value
− 15%e0
Qualifier
increasing temperatures and reduced rainfalle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of late varieties, while suffering the most from increasing temperatures and reduced rainfall (− 15%, on average)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1993–2114 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“For grapevine, the use of late varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1978–2018 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Early grapevine varieties showed some increases relative to baseline but generally lower production than late varieties.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Material
earlier varietiese0
Outcome
yield losst0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the baselinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“earlier varieties, which even if showing some increases with respect to the baseline have a generally much lower production level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2185–2315 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“For grapevine, the use of late varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1978–2018 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Early olive tree varieties gained 4% under climate change.

Taxon
olive treeOlea europaeae1
Material
earlye0
Outcome
yield losst0
Direction
favourable influencee0
Value
+ 4 and + 3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“climate change exerts a favourable influence (+ 4 and + 3% for early and late varieties, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2444–2547 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“The same may be applied to olive tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2316–2353 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Late olive tree varieties gained 3% under climate change.

Taxon
olive treeOlea europaeae1
Material
latee0
Outcome
yield losst0
Direction
favourable influencee0
Value
+ 3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“climate change exerts a favourable influence (+ 4 and + 3% for early and late varieties, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2444–2547 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“The same may be applied to olive tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2316–2353 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

sowing time · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 30 positive, 14 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.