Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Interactions

Responses of growth, yield and N use efficiency of selected tomato cultivars to variations in hydrothermal regimes of the cropping seasons in a tropical rainforest zone of Nigeria

S. O. Agele; I. A. Adeniji; E. O. Alabi; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated responses of some cultivars of tomato to weather events of the cropping seasons in terms of growth, fruit yield, and nitrogen use efficiency when grown under the application of inorganic and organic manures. The tomato varieties selected for evaluation Ibadan local, SAMTOM and Roma VF elite lines, and were grown as both early and dry season crops in the humid rainforest zone of Nigeria. The cultivars were characterized by strong genotype by environment interactions and seasonal and/or genotype-specific N use efficiency. In both cropping seasons, the tomato cultivars differed in their ability to take up and accumulate N in the shoot and fruit tissues from the organic and mineral fertilizers. Significanty higher values of fresh and dry weights of root and shoot biomass were produced by tomato plants grown in plots in which NPK and poultry manure were applied over unmanured plots. Superior efficiencies of N uptake and utilization for fruit production were recorded for the Roma lines (T1410 and T1579). Delayed planting (dry season crop) did not considerably decrease N uptake and utilization efficiencies of N, but decreased final crop dry matter yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato cultivars showed genotype by environment interactions and season or genotype-specific nitrogen use efficiency.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars were characterized by strong genotype by environment interactions and seasonal and/or genotype-specific N use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato cultivars differed in nitrogen uptake and accumulation in shoots and fruits in both seasons.

Material
cultivarse0
Organ / stage
shoot and fruit tissuese0
Outcome
take up and accumulate Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both cropping seasons, the tomato cultivars differed in their ability to take up and accumulate N in the shoot and fruit tissues from the organic and mineral fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased fresh and dry root and shoot biomass relative to unmanured plots.

Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
fresh and dry weights of root and shoot biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unmanured plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significanty higher values of fresh and dry weights of root and shoot biomass were produced by tomato plants grown in plots in which NPK and poultry manure were applied over unmanured plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure increased fresh and dry root and shoot biomass relative to unmanured plots.

Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
fresh and dry weights of root and shoot biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unmanured plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significanty higher values of fresh and dry weights of root and shoot biomass were produced by tomato plants grown in plots in which NPK and poultry manure were applied over unmanured plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–920 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roma lines T1410 and T1579 had superior nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency for fruit production.

Material
Roma linese0
Outcome
efficiencies of N uptake and utilization for fruit productione0
Direction
Superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superior efficiencies of N uptake and utilization for fruit production were recorded for the Roma lines (T1410 and T1579).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting did not considerably decrease nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiencies.

Treatment
Delayed planting (dry season crop)e0
Outcome
N uptake and utilization efficiencies of Ne0
Direction
did not considerably decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed planting (dry season crop) did not considerably decrease N uptake and utilization efficiencies of N, but decreased final crop dry matter yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting decreased final crop dry matter yield.

Treatment
Delayed planting (dry season crop)e0
Outcome
final crop dry matter yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed planting (dry season crop) did not considerably decrease N uptake and utilization efficiencies of N, but decreased final crop dry matter yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑

drought · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

sowing time · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

drought · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 19 positive, 62 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.