Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Chlorophyll Content in Leaves of Wheat as Influenced by Inorganic, Organic and Integrated Sources of Nutrient Application

Megha Vishwakarma; P. S. Kulhare; G. S. Tagore

17
claims
45
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during winter season of 2018-19 and 2019-20 with three sources of nutrient viz., inorganic, organics (FYM, VC and biofertilizers) and their integration as main treatments and five levels [S1-0 (0-0-0 kg NPK ha-1), S2-100% (120-60-40 kg NPK ha-1), S3-150% (180-90-60 kg NPK ha-1), S4-200% (240-120-80 kg NPK ha-1) and S5-Soil Test based (STV) NPK i.e. 149-176-33 kg ha-1 in split plot design with three replications. The chlorophyll content (‘a’, ‘b’ and total) in leaves and Soil Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value were recorded at crown root initiation (CRI), tillering, jointing and milking stage of wheat. The pooled data of findings revealed that the treatment with inorganic sources showed significant increase in the SPAD readings (9.62, 15.54, 23.77 and 29.83), chlorophyll ‘a’ (0.76, 0.83, 1.47 and 0.63 mg g-1 leaf tissue), ‘b’ (0.44, 0.78, 0.87 and 0.57 mg g-1 leaf tissue) and total (1.19, 1.64, 2.25 and 1.14 mg g-1 leaf tissue) chlorophyll content in leaves over organic source at all the growth stages. All the levels of nutrient were significantly increased the chlorophyll content and SPAD value over control at all the stages except chlorophyll ‘a’ at jointing and milking stage. However, amongst the levels 150% and 200% NPK were found significantly superior to 100% NPK for SPAD value (8.32 and 8.71 at CRI and 12.56 and 12.19 at tillering), chlorophyll ‘a’ (0.73 and 0.70 mg g-1 leaf tissue at CRI), chlorophyll ‘b’ (0.46 and 0.45 mg g-1 leaf tissue at CRI, 0.68 and 0.71 mg g-1 leaf tissue at tillering and 0.53 and 0.59 mg g-1 leaf tissue at milking), respectively. The interaction results suggested that the 200% NPK with inorganic and integrated sources significantly superior to 100% NPK for chlorophyll ‘a’ content at jointing and milking stage. The application of 150% and 200% NPK with inorganic source were found significantly higher over the same level of NPK with integrated source of nutrient for total chlorophyll content and SPAD value at all the growth stages except 150% NPK for total chlorophyll at jointing and milking stage and SPAD value at milking stage. The correlation between SPAD value and chlorophyll ’a’, ‘b’, total were found significantly and positively at all growth stages. Coefficient of determination values between SPAD and chlorophyll content showed linear relationship at all the growth stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic sources significantly increased wheat SPAD readings over organic sources at all stages, with values 9.62, 15.54, 23.77 and 29.83.

Treatment
inorganic sourcese0
Outcome
SPAD readingse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.62, 15.54, 23.77 and 29.83e0
Comparator
organic sourcee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with inorganic sources showed significant increase in the SPAD readings (9.62, 15.54, 23.77 and 29.83)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–805 · show in text ↑
e1

“over organic source at all the growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic sources significantly increased chlorophyll a over organic sources at all stages.

Treatment
inorganic sourcese1
Outcome
chlorophyll ‘a’e0
Direction
increasee1
Value
0.76, 0.83, 1.47 and 0.63 mg g-1 leaf tissuee0
Comparator
organic sourcee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll ‘a’ (0.76, 0.83, 1.47 and 0.63 mg g-1 leaf tissue)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–869 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment with inorganic sources showed significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–753 · show in text ↑
e2

“over organic source at all the growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic sources significantly increased chlorophyll b over organic sources at all stages.

Treatment
inorganic sourcese1
Outcome
‘b’e0
Direction
increasee1
Value
0.44, 0.78, 0.87 and 0.57 mg g-1 leaf tissuee0
Comparator
organic sourcee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘b’ (0.44, 0.78, 0.87 and 0.57 mg g-1 leaf tissue)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–921 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment with inorganic sources showed significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–753 · show in text ↑
e2

“over organic source at all the growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic sources significantly increased total chlorophyll over organic sources at all stages.

Treatment
inorganic sourcese1
Outcome
chlorophyll content in leavese0
Direction
increasee1
Value
1.19, 1.64, 2.25 and 1.14 mg g-1 leaf tissuee0
Qualifier
totale0
Comparator
organic sourcee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total (1.19, 1.64, 2.25 and 1.14 mg g-1 leaf tissue) chlorophyll content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1008 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment with inorganic sources showed significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–753 · show in text ↑
e2

“over organic source at all the growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All nutrient levels significantly increased chlorophyll content and SPAD over control except chlorophyll a at jointing and milking.

Treatment
All the levels of nutriente0
Outcome
chlorophyll content and SPAD valuee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at all the stages except chlorophyll ‘a’ at jointing and milking stagee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the levels of nutrient were significantly increased the chlorophyll content and SPAD value over control at all the stages except chlorophyll ‘a’ at jointing and milking stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

150% NPK significantly exceeded 100% NPK for SPAD at CRI and tillering, with values 8.32 and 12.56.

Treatment
150%e0
Outcome
SPAD valuee0
Direction
superiore0
Value
8.32e0
Qualifier
12.56e0
Comparator
100% NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150% and 200% NPK were found significantly superior to 100% NPK for SPAD value (8.32 and 8.71 at CRI and 12.56 and 12.19 at tillering)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

200% NPK significantly exceeded 100% NPK for SPAD at CRI and tillering, with values 8.71 and 12.19.

Treatment
200% NPKe0
Outcome
SPAD valuee0
Direction
superiore0
Value
8.71e0
Qualifier
12.19e0
Comparator
100% NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150% and 200% NPK were found significantly superior to 100% NPK for SPAD value (8.32 and 8.71 at CRI and 12.56 and 12.19 at tillering)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

150% NPK significantly exceeded 100% NPK for chlorophyll a at CRI, with 0.73 mg g-1 leaf tissue.

Organ / stage
CRIe1
Treatment
150%e0
Outcome
chlorophyll ‘a’e1
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.73e1
Comparator
100% NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150% and 200% NPK were found significantly superior to 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1326 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll ‘a’ (0.73 and 0.70 mg g-1 leaf tissue at CRI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

200% NPK significantly exceeded 100% NPK for chlorophyll a at CRI, with 0.70 mg g-1 leaf tissue.

Organ / stage
CRIe1
Treatment
200% NPKe0
Outcome
chlorophyll ‘a’e1
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.70 mg g-1 leaf tissuee1
Comparator
100% NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150% and 200% NPK were found significantly superior to 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1326 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll ‘a’ (0.73 and 0.70 mg g-1 leaf tissue at CRI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

150% NPK significantly exceeded 100% NPK for chlorophyll b at CRI, tillering and milking, with respective values 0.46, 0.68 and 0.53 mg g-1 leaf tissue.

Treatment
150%e0
Outcome
chlorophyll ‘b’e1
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.46e1
Qualifier
0.68e1
Comparator
100% NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150% and 200% NPK were found significantly superior to 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1326 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll ‘b’ (0.46 and 0.45 mg g-1 leaf tissue at CRI, 0.68 and 0.71 mg g-1 leaf tissue at tillering and 0.53 and 0.59 mg g-1 leaf tissue at milking)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

200% NPK significantly exceeded 100% NPK for chlorophyll b at CRI, tillering and milking, with respective values 0.45, 0.71 and 0.59 mg g-1 leaf tissue.

Treatment
200% NPKe0
Outcome
chlorophyll ‘b’e1
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.45 mg g-1 leaf tissuee1
Qualifier
0.71 mg g-1 leaf tissuee1
Comparator
100% NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150% and 200% NPK were found significantly superior to 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1326 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll ‘b’ (0.46 and 0.45 mg g-1 leaf tissue at CRI, 0.68 and 0.71 mg g-1 leaf tissue at tillering and 0.53 and 0.59 mg g-1 leaf tissue at milking)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

200% NPK with inorganic sources significantly exceeded 100% NPK for chlorophyll a at jointing and milking.

Organ / stage
jointing and milking stagee0
Treatment
200% NPKe0
Outcome
chlorophyll ‘a’ contente0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
inorganice0
Comparator
100% NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 200% NPK with inorganic and integrated sources significantly superior to 100% NPK for chlorophyll ‘a’ content at jointing and milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

200% NPK with integrated sources significantly exceeded 100% NPK for chlorophyll a at jointing and milking.

Organ / stage
jointing and milking stagee0
Treatment
200% NPKe0
Outcome
chlorophyll ‘a’ contente0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
integrated sourcese0
Comparator
100% NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 200% NPK with inorganic and integrated sources significantly superior to 100% NPK for chlorophyll ‘a’ content at jointing and milking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

150% NPK with inorganic sources significantly exceeded integrated sources for total chlorophyll and SPAD, except total chlorophyll at jointing and milking and SPAD at milking.

Treatment
150%e0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content and SPAD valuee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except 150% NPK for total chlorophyll at jointing and milking stage and SPAD value at milking stagee0
Comparator
integrated source of nutriente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 150% and 200% NPK with inorganic source were found significantly higher over the same level of NPK with integrated source of nutrient for total chlorophyll content and SPAD value at all the growth stages except 150% NPK for total chlorophyll at jointing and milking stage and SPAD value at milking stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–2133 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

200% NPK with inorganic sources significantly exceeded integrated sources for total chlorophyll and SPAD at all growth stages.

Treatment
200% NPK with inorganic sourcee0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content and SPAD valuee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
integrated source of nutriente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“200% NPK with inorganic source were found significantly higher over the same level of NPK with integrated source of nutrient for total chlorophyll content and SPAD value at all the growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–2032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD was significantly positively correlated with chlorophyll a, b and total at all stages.

Outcome
chlorophyll ’a’, ‘b’, totale0
Direction
positivelye0
Comparator
SPAD valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation between SPAD value and chlorophyll ’a’, ‘b’, total were found significantly and positively at all growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2134–2262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Determination coefficients indicated a linear relationship between SPAD and chlorophyll content at all stages.

Outcome
Coefficient of determination valuese0
Qualifier
linear relationshipe0
Comparator
SPADe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coefficient of determination values between SPAD and chlorophyll content showed linear relationship at all the growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2263–2388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.