Paper · 2021 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effects of different mechanical direct seeding methods on grain yield and lodging resistance of early indica rice in South China

Wen-xia WANG; Jie DU; Yan-zhi ZHOU; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Direct seeding of rice has become a main planting method due to the low labor input and high economic benefit in South China. Dry direct seeding (DDS) has been widely used for single-season rice planting establishment. However, few studies have examined the performance of early-season indica rice under mechanical dry direct seeding. A two-year field experiment was conducted with two indica rice cultivars (i.e., Zhongjiazao 17 and Zhuliangyou 819) to study lodging characteristics and grain yield formation under DDS, flooded direct seeding (FDS) and wet direct seeding (WDS) patterns. The results showed that the annual grain yield in DDS was higher by 14.42–26.34% for cultivar ZLY819 and 6.64–24.58% for cultivar ZJZ17 than in WDS and FDS, respectively, and these increases were mainly attributed to the improvement of the panicles. The DDS pattern significantly increased the seedling emergence rate of early indica rice cultivars, and increased total dry weight and crop growth rate. Meanwhile, shorter basal internodes, better stem diameter and stem wall thickness and lower lodging index were found in DDS in contrast to FDS and WDS. In particular, DDS improved the stem lodging resistance. Our results suggested that the appropriate direct seeding method was beneficial for improving the grain yield and lodging resistance of early indica rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DDS increased ZLY819 yield by 14.42–26.34% relative to WDS and FDS.

Material
ZLY819e0
Treatment
DDSe0
Outcome
annual grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.42–26.34%e0
Comparator
WDS and FDSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“annual grain yield in DDS was higher by 14.42–26.34% for cultivar ZLY819 and 6.64–24.58% for cultivar ZJZ17 than in WDS and FDS, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DDS increased ZJZ17 yield by 6.64–24.58% relative to WDS and FDS.

Material
ZJZ17e0
Treatment
DDSe0
Outcome
annual grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.64–24.58%e0
Comparator
WDS and FDSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“annual grain yield in DDS was higher by 14.42–26.34% for cultivar ZLY819 and 6.64–24.58% for cultivar ZJZ17 than in WDS and FDS, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicle improvement mainly accounted for higher DDS yield.

Organ / stage
paniclese0
Outcome
these increasese0
Qualifier
improvement of the paniclese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these increases were mainly attributed to the improvement of the panicles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DDS significantly increased seedling emergence rate.

Treatment
DDS patterne0
Outcome
seedling emergence ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DDS pattern significantly increased the seedling emergence rate of early indica rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DDS increased dry weight and growth rate.

Treatment
DDSe0
Outcome
total dry weight and crop growth ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DDS pattern significantly increased the seedling emergence rate of early indica rice cultivars, and increased total dry weight and crop growth rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DDS produced shorter basal internodes.

Treatment
DDSe0
Outcome
basal internodese0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
FDS and WDSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shorter basal internodes, better stem diameter and stem wall thickness and lower lodging index were found in DDS in contrast to FDS and WDS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DDS improved stem diameter and wall thickness.

Treatment
DDSe0
Outcome
stem diameter and stem wall thicknesse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
FDS and WDSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“better stem diameter and stem wall thickness and lower lodging index were found in DDS in contrast to FDS and WDS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DDS lowered lodging index.

Treatment
DDSe0
Outcome
lodging indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
FDS and WDSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower lodging index were found in DDS in contrast to FDS and WDS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DDS improved stem lodging resistance.

Treatment
DDSe0
Outcome
stem lodging resistancee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DDS improved the stem lodging resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑

transplanting · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 34 positive, 17 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 190 positive, 37 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.