Paper · 2021 · Journal of Fungi

Trichoderma Biological Control to Protect Sensitive Maize Hybrids against Late Wilt Disease in the Field

Ofir Degani; Shlomit Dor

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
80
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Late wilt, a disease severely affecting maize fields throughout Israel, is characterized by the relatively rapid wilting of maize plants from the tasseling stage to maturity. The disease is caused by the fungus Magnaporthiopsis maydis, a soil and seed-borne pathogen. The pathogen is controlled traditionally through the use of maize cultivars having reduced sensitivity to the disease. Nevertheless, such cultivars may lose their immunity after several years of intensive growth due to the presence of high virulent isolates of M. maydis. Alternative effective and economical chemical treatment to the disease was recently established but is dependent on the use of a dripline assigned for two adjacent rows and exposes the risk of fungicide resistance. In the current work, eight marine and soil isolates of Trichoderma spp., known for high mycoparasitic potential, were tested as biocontrol agents against M. maydis. An in vitro confront plate assay revealed strong antagonistic activity against the pathogen of two T. longibrachiatum isolates and of T. asperelloides. These species produce soluble metabolites that can inhibit or kill the maize pathogen in submerged and solid media culture growth assays. In greenhouse experiments accompanied by real-time PCR tracking of the pathogen, the Trichoderma species or their metabolites managed to improve the seedlings’ wet biomass and reduced the pathogen DNA in the maize roots. A follow-up experiment carried out through a whole growth session, under field conditions, provided important support to the Trichoderma species’ beneficial impact. The direct addition of T. longibrachiatum and even more T. asperelloides to the seeds, with the sowing, resulted in a yield improvement, a significant increase in the growth parameters and crops, to the degree of noninfected plants. These bioprotective treatments also restricted the pathogen DNA in the host tissues (up to 98%) and prevented the disease symptoms. The results encourage more in-depth research to uncover such biological agents’ potential and the methods to implement them in commercial fields. If adequately developed into final products and combined with other control methods, the biological control could play an important role in maize crop protection against Late wilt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two T. longibrachiatum isolates antagonized M. maydis in vitro.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
T. longibrachiatumTrichoderma longibrachiatume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
strong antagonistic activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An in vitro confront plate assay revealed strong antagonistic activity against the pathogen of two T. longibrachiatum isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. asperelloides antagonized M. maydis in vitro.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
T. asperelloidesTrichoderma asperelloidese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
strong antagonistic activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An in vitro confront plate assay revealed strong antagonistic activity against the pathogen of two T. longibrachiatum isolates and of T. asperelloides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble metabolites from these species inhibited or killed the maize pathogen in culture.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
maize pathogene0pathogen
Outcome
inhibit or kill the maize pathogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These species produce soluble metabolites that can inhibit or kill the maize pathogen in submerged and solid media culture growth assays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma species or metabolites improved seedling wet biomass in greenhouse experiments.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Trichoderma species or their metabolitese0
Outcome
seedlings’ wet biomasse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Trichoderma species or their metabolites managed to improve the seedlings’ wet biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma species or metabolites reduced pathogen DNA in maize roots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Trichoderma species or their metabolitese0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Outcome
pathogen DNA in the maize rootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Trichoderma species or their metabolites managed to improve the seedlings’ wet biomass and reduced the pathogen DNA in the maize roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed application of T. longibrachiatum improved field yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T. longibrachiatume0
Interactor
T. longibrachiatumTrichoderma longibrachiatume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The direct addition of T. longibrachiatum and even more T. asperelloides to the seeds, with the sowing, resulted in a yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed application of T. asperelloides improved field yield more strongly.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T. asperelloidese0
Interactor
T. asperelloidesTrichoderma asperelloidese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
T. longibrachiatume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The direct addition of T. longibrachiatum and even more T. asperelloides to the seeds, with the sowing, resulted in a yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed application of Trichoderma increased growth parameters and crops to levels of noninfected plants.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Trichodermat0
Outcome
growth parameters and cropse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
noninfected plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase in the growth parameters and crops, to the degree of noninfected plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1733–1827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trichoderma Biological Control to Protect Sensitive Maize Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioprotective treatments restricted pathogen DNA in host tissues by up to 98%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
bioprotective treatmentse0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Outcome
pathogen DNA in the host tissuese0
Direction
restrictede0
Value
up to 98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These bioprotective treatments also restricted the pathogen DNA in the host tissues (up to 98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–1924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioprotective treatments prevented late wilt symptoms.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
bioprotective treatmentse0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Outcome
prevented the disease symptomse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These bioprotective treatments also restricted the pathogen DNA in the host tissues (up to 98%) and prevented the disease symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–1959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose developing biological control with other methods for maize late wilt protection.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
biological control could play an important role in maize crop protection against Late wilte0
Qualifier
If adequately developed into final products and combined with other control methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If adequately developed into final products and combined with other control methods, the biological control could play an important role in maize crop protection against Late wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2286 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma longibrachiatum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

metabolite · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Trichoderma · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

metabolite · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.