Paper · 2010 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Effects of some Iranian Trichoderma isolates on maize seed germination and seedling vigor

Behzad Hajieghrari

11
claims
29
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Trichoderma species are commonly used as biological control agents against phytopathogenic fungi and some of their isolates are able to improve plant growth. In the current study, we evaluated some Iranian Trichoderma isolate cultural filtrates as well as their direct effect on seed germination and seedling vigor of maize (Zea mays L. cultivar B73); they are Trichoderma harzianum T 969, T. harzianum T 447, Trichoderma hamatum T 614, Trichoderma roseum T678, Gliocladium virens G525 and the unknown Trichoderma species isolate (Trichoderma sp. T) obtained from the soil of Moghan Area, Ardabil Province of Iran. The culture filtrates reduced the speed of seed germination, but no influence (p0.05) was recorded at the final rate of the seed germination. When maize seeds were exposed to the Trichoderma spore suspension, all the Trichoderma isolates colonized the seed surface and inhibited the seed germination. The maize seed potted in inoculated soil did not emerge from the soil among all tested Trichoderma isolates, except for non-inoculated soil 30 days after potting. When Trichoderma conidia were added on the surface of soil near the emerged seed, significant (p0.01) decrease of seedling treated separately with T. hamatum T614 isolate was observed on the leaves area, fresh root and shoot weight, compared to the non-inoculated seedling. Whereas T. hamatum T447 and T. harzianum T969 reduced markedly (p0.01), seedling fresh root weight and fresh shoot weight were respectively increased as compared to the control. Trichoderma isolates had no influence on chlorophyll content in leaves and root length as well as stomata conductivity, except for Trichoderma spp. isolate T that increased stomata conductivity of seedling significantly (p0.01).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture filtrates slowed maize seed germination.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
culture filtratese0
Outcome
speed of seed germinatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The culture filtrates reduced the speed of seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture filtrates did not significantly change final seed germination.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
culture filtratese0
Outcome
final rate of the seed germinatione0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The culture filtrates reduced the speed of seed germination, but no influence (p0.05) was recorded at the final rate of the seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested Trichoderma isolates colonized the maize seed surface.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0symbiont
Outcome
colonized the seed surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the Trichoderma isolates colonized the seed surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma spore suspension inhibited maize seed germination.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Trichoderma spore suspensione0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0symbiont
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When maize seeds were exposed to the Trichoderma spore suspension, all the Trichoderma isolates colonized the seed surface and inhibited the seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize seeds in inoculated soil failed to emerge after 30 days, unlike non-inoculated soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
inoculated soile0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0symbiont
Outcome
did not emerge from the soile0
Qualifier
30 days after pottinge0
Comparator
non-inoculated soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maize seed potted in inoculated soil did not emerge from the soil among all tested Trichoderma isolates, except for non-inoculated soil 30 days after potting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. hamatum T614 reduced maize seedling leaf area.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T. hamatum T614 isolatee0
Interactor
T. hamatum T614Trichoderma hamatume0symbiont
Outcome
leaves areae0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
non-inoculated seedlinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant (p0.01) decrease of seedling treated separately with T. hamatum T614 isolate was observed on the leaves area, fresh root and shoot weight, compared to the non-inoculated seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. hamatum T614 reduced fresh root and shoot weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T. hamatum T614 isolatee0
Interactor
T. hamatum T614Trichoderma hamatume0symbiont
Outcome
fresh root and shoot weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
non-inoculated seedlinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant (p0.01) decrease of seedling treated separately with T. hamatum T614 isolate was observed on the leaves area, fresh root and shoot weight, compared to the non-inoculated seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported T. hamatum T447 treatment reduced seedling fresh root weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T. hamatum T447e0
Interactor
T. hamatum T447Trichoderma hamatume0symbiont
Outcome
seedling fresh root weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. hamatum T447 and T. harzianum T969 reduced markedly (p0.01), seedling fresh root weight and fresh shoot weight were respectively increased as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1532 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported T. harzianum T969 treatment increased seedling fresh shoot weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T. harzianum T969e0
Interactor
T. harzianum T969Trichoderma harzianume0symbiont
Outcome
fresh shoot weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. hamatum T447 and T. harzianum T969 reduced markedly (p0.01), seedling fresh root weight and fresh shoot weight were respectively increased as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1532 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma isolates had no reported effect on chlorophyll content, root length or stomata conductivity, apart from the stated exception.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Trichoderma isolatese0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll content in leaves and root length as well as stomata conductivitye0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma isolates had no influence on chlorophyll content in leaves and root length as well as stomata conductivity, except for Trichoderma spp. isolate T that increased stomata conductivity of seedling significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1753 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma spp. isolate T significantly increased seedling stomata conductivity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Trichoderma spp. isolate Te0
Interactor
Trichoderma spp. isolate Te0symbiont
Outcome
stomata conductivity of seedlinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma spp. isolate T that increased stomata conductivity of seedling significantly (p0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1762 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Trichoderma hamatum · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Trichoderma · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Trichoderma · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pathogen product · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 12 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.