Paper · 2008 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Effects of Fusarium verticilloides , its metabolites and neem leaf extract on germination and vigour indices of maize ( Zea mays L.)

Samuel Toba Anjorin; Hussaini Anthony Makun; Titilayo Adesina; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) seed samples were collected from three markets in Minna, Niger State to investigate the effect of Fusarium verticilloides, its metabolites and neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf ethanolic extract on germination of the seeds and seedling vigour. Among the fungi genera isolated from the seeds samples were Aspergillus spp. (41.18%), Fusarium spp. (29.41%) and Rhizopus spp. (23.53%). F. verticilloides metabolite was extracted using dichloromethane and phosphoric acid (10:1) while powdered neem leaf was extracted with ethanol for 72 h. The experiment, which was made up of eight treatments and three replicates, was set up in a germination chamber. At 9 days after sowing (9 DAS), the seeds applied with combined F. verticilloides mycelia and their metabolites had the least germination percentage (30%), the highest rot-index (3.5) and the least seedling vigour (0.93). The seeds applied with neem extract only had the highest germination percentage of 100%, the least rot index (0.5) and seedling vigour index (5.4). Though neem leaf extract proved to be fungitoxic against F. verticilloides, further investigation on the pathogenic mode of action of fusariotoxin on germination and growth of cereal crops on the field is necessary.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined F. verticilloides mycelia and metabolites gave the least germination percentage (30%) at 9 days after sowing.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
combined F. verticilloides mycelia and their metabolitese2
Interactor
F. verticilloidese2pathogen
Outcome
germination percentagee2
Direction
leaste2
Value
30%e2
Qualifier
9 DASe2
Setting
germination chambere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e2

“At 9 days after sowing (9 DAS), the seeds applied with combined F. verticilloides mycelia and their metabolites had the least germination percentage (30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–820 · show in text ↑
e3

“was set up in a germination chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined F. verticilloides mycelia and metabolites gave the highest rot-index (3.5).

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
combined F. verticilloides mycelia and their metabolitese2
Interactor
F. verticilloidese2pathogen
Outcome
rot-indexe2
Direction
higheste2
Value
3.5e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e2

“the seeds applied with combined F. verticilloides mycelia and their metabolites had the least germination percentage (30%), the highest rot-index (3.5) and the least seedling vigour (0.93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined F. verticilloides mycelia and metabolites gave the least seedling vigour (0.93).

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
combined F. verticilloides mycelia and their metabolitese2
Interactor
F. verticilloidese2pathogen
Outcome
seedling vigoure2
Direction
leaste2
Value
0.93e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e2

“the seeds applied with combined F. verticilloides mycelia and their metabolites had the least germination percentage (30%), the highest rot-index (3.5) and the least seedling vigour (0.93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf extract alone gave the highest germination percentage (100%).

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
neem extract onlye2
Outcome
germination percentagee2
Direction
higheste2
Value
100%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e2

“The seeds applied with neem extract only had the highest germination percentage of 100%, the least rot index (0.5) and seedling vigour index (5.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf extract alone gave the least rot index (0.5).

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
neem extract onlye2
Outcome
rot indexe2
Direction
leaste2
Value
0.5e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e2

“The seeds applied with neem extract only had the highest germination percentage of 100%, the least rot index (0.5) and seedling vigour index (5.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf extract alone gave a higher seedling vigour index (5.4) than the other treatments.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
neem extract onlye2
Outcome
seedling vigour indexe2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
5.4e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e2

“The seeds applied with neem extract only had the highest germination percentage of 100%, the least rot index (0.5) and seedling vigour index (5.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf extract was fungitoxic against F. verticilloides.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
neem leaf extracte2
Interactor
F. verticilloidese2pathogen
Outcome
fungitoxice2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e2

“neem leaf extract proved to be fungitoxic against F. verticilloides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus spp. was isolated from the maize seed samples at 41.18%.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Interactor
Aspergillus spp.Aspergilluse2other
Outcome
fungi genera isolatede2
Value
41.18%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus
Aspergillus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the fungi genera isolated from the seeds samples were Aspergillus spp. (41.18%), Fusarium spp. (29.41%) and Rhizopus spp. (23.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium spp. was isolated from the maize seed samples at 29.41%.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume2other
Outcome
fungi genera isolatede2
Value
29.41%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the fungi genera isolated from the seeds samples were Aspergillus spp. (41.18%), Fusarium spp. (29.41%) and Rhizopus spp. (23.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizopus spp. was isolated from the maize seed samples at 23.53%.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Interactor
Rhizopus spp.Rhizopuse2other
Outcome
fungi genera isolatede2
Value
23.53%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus
Rhizopus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRamy algayar · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the fungi genera isolated from the seeds samples were Aspergillus spp. (41.18%), Fusarium spp. (29.41%) and Rhizopus spp. (23.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–397 · show in text ↑

metabolite · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

metabolite · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Azadirachta indica · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Azadirachta indica · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

botanical · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 57 positive, 10 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.