Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying garlic and neem extract at 5% in fields adequately managed the maize disease.

A claim from Evaluation of plant extracts for management of maydis leaf blight of maize. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying garlic and neem extract at 5% in fields adequately managed the maize disease.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
spraying of garlic and neem extract @ 5%e5
Outcome
diseasee5
Direction
adequately managede5
Setting
in fieldse5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74
e5

“The disease was adequately managed by spraying of garlic and neem extract @ 5% in fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–654

Title

Evaluation of plant extracts for management of maydis leaf blight of maize.

Sanjeev Kumar; Archana Rani; M. M. Jha Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2009

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e14144dcf812297653a8b69e62e7189b7788f0ee59b3d26986b210c175be9ec3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

Allium sativum · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Azadirachta indica · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

botanical · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 57 positive, 10 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

58 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.