Paper · 2015 · Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Allelopathic Effect of Lantana camara L. Leaf Powder on Germination and Growth Behaviour of Maize, Zea mays Linn. and Wheat, Triticum turgidum Linn. Cultivars

Abiyu Enyew; Nagappan Raja

16
claims
36
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Aim of the present study was to evaluate allelopathic effect of Lantana camara leaf powder on germination and growth behaviour of Zea mays and Triticum turgidum. The pot culture experiments were conducted at Botany laboratory, Tewodros campus, University of Gondar, Ethiopia from November 2012 to April 2013. The experimental design was Completely Randomized Block Design (CRBD) with three treatments and one control. The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively. The percentage of germination, root and shoot length, stem thickness and biomass were recorded from three replicates. Maximum germination percentage of wheat (96.60%) and maize (53.33%) was recorded at T1 and it was minimum (70%) in wheat and maize (43.33%) at T3 compared to control (100%). The germination index of wheat and maize was 5 cm and 1.9 cm, respectively at T1. The shoot and root length variation observed in wheat and maize was statistically significant (p<0.05) compared to control. The percentage root inhibition of wheat and maize was 62.1 and 39.4%, respectively at T3 compared to control. The stem thickness variation among the treatment and control was statistically significant (p<0.05) in both the experimental plants. Maximum fresh weight and dry weight of wheat was 1.3 g and 0.4 g, respectively at T0 and minimum was 0.8 and 0.1 g, respectively at T3. In maize, maximum fresh weight and dry weight was 8.5 g and 1.5 g, respectively at T0 and minimum 3.9 and 0.4 g, respectively at T3. The biomass variation of wheat and maize results were statistically significant (p<0.05). In conclusion, L. camara leaf powder significantly inhibits seed germination, speed of germination, shoot and root length, stem thickness and biomass of wheat and maize. By keeping the L. camara plants around agricultural field may affect growth parameter of wheat and maize. Further studies on characterization of phytochemicals and their specific role in different agricultural crops is important.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At T3 (75 g of L. camara leaf powder) wheat germination was at its minimum, 70%, against 100% in control.

Treatment
75 g of L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
minimume1
Value
70%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maximum germination percentage of wheat (96.60%) and maize (53.33%) was recorded at T1 and it was minimum (70%) in wheat and maize (43.33%) at T3 compared to control (100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–875 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At T1 wheat germination reached a maximum of 96.60%, below the 100% control.

Treatment
L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
96.60%e1
Qualifier
recorded at T1e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maximum germination percentage of wheat (96.60%) and maize (53.33%) was recorded at T1 and it was minimum (70%) in wheat and maize (43.33%) at T3 compared to control (100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–875 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root inhibition was 62.1 at T3 (75 g of L. camara leaf powder) compared with control.

Treatment
75 g of L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
percentage root inhibitione1
Direction
inhibitione1
Value
62.1e1
Qualifier
at T3e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The percentage root inhibition of wheat and maize was 62.1 and 39.4%, respectively at T3 compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1191 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat fresh weight was lowest, 0.8 g, at T3 (75 g of L. camara leaf powder) relative to control T0.

Treatment
75 g of L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
fresh weighte1
Direction
minimume1
Value
0.8e1
Comparator
control (T0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maximum fresh weight and dry weight of wheat was 1.3 g and 0.4 g, respectively at T0 and minimum was 0.8 and 0.1 g, respectively at T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1460 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat dry weight was lowest, 0.1 g, at T3 (75 g of L. camara leaf powder) relative to control T0.

Treatment
75 g of L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
dry weighte1
Direction
minimume1
Value
0.1e1
Comparator
control (T0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maximum fresh weight and dry weight of wheat was 1.3 g and 0.4 g, respectively at T0 and minimum was 0.8 and 0.1 g, respectively at T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1460 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

L. camara leaf powder significantly inhibited wheat shoot length, root length and stem thickness relative to control.

Treatment
L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
shoot and root length, stem thicknesse3
Direction
inhibitse3
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The shoot and root length variation observed in wheat and maize was statistically significant (p<0.05) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1081 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“In conclusion, L. camara leaf powder significantly inhibits seed germination, speed of germination, shoot and root length, stem thickness and biomass of wheat and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

L. camara leaf powder significantly inhibited wheat biomass relative to control.

Treatment
L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
inhibitse3
Comparator
control (T0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The biomass variation of wheat and maize results were statistically significant (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1683 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“In conclusion, L. camara leaf powder significantly inhibits seed germination, speed of germination, shoot and root length, stem thickness and biomass of wheat and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat germination index was 5 cm at T1 with L. camara leaf powder.

Treatment
L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
germination indexe1
Value
5 cme1
Qualifier
at T1e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The germination index of wheat and maize was 5 cm and 1.9 cm, respectively at T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–957 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At T1 maize germination reached a maximum of 53.33%, below the 100% control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
53.33%e1
Qualifier
recorded at T1e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maximum germination percentage of wheat (96.60%) and maize (53.33%) was recorded at T1 and it was minimum (70%) in wheat and maize (43.33%) at T3 compared to control (100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–875 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At T3 (75 g of L. camara leaf powder) maize germination was at its minimum, 43.33%, against 100% in control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
75 g of L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
minimume1
Value
43.33%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maximum germination percentage of wheat (96.60%) and maize (53.33%) was recorded at T1 and it was minimum (70%) in wheat and maize (43.33%) at T3 compared to control (100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–875 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize root inhibition was 39.4% at T3 (75 g of L. camara leaf powder) compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
75 g of L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
percentage root inhibitione1
Direction
inhibitione1
Value
39.4%e1
Qualifier
at T3e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The percentage root inhibition of wheat and maize was 62.1 and 39.4%, respectively at T3 compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1191 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize fresh weight was lowest, 3.9 g, at T3 (75 g of L. camara leaf powder) relative to control T0.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
75 g of L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
fresh weighte1
Direction
minimume1
Value
3.9e1
Comparator
control (T0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In maize, maximum fresh weight and dry weight was 8.5 g and 1.5 g, respectively at T0 and minimum 3.9 and 0.4 g, respectively at T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1593 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize dry weight was lowest, 0.4 g, at T3 (75 g of L. camara leaf powder) relative to control T0.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
75 g of L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
dry weighte1
Direction
minimume1
Value
0.4e1
Comparator
control (T0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In maize, maximum fresh weight and dry weight was 8.5 g and 1.5 g, respectively at T0 and minimum 3.9 and 0.4 g, respectively at T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1593 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

L. camara leaf powder significantly inhibited maize shoot length, root length and stem thickness relative to control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Treatment
L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
shoot and root length, stem thicknesse3
Direction
inhibitse3
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The shoot and root length variation observed in wheat and maize was statistically significant (p<0.05) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1081 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“In conclusion, L. camara leaf powder significantly inhibits seed germination, speed of germination, shoot and root length, stem thickness and biomass of wheat and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

L. camara leaf powder significantly inhibited maize biomass relative to control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Treatment
L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
inhibitse3
Comparator
control (T0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The biomass variation of wheat and maize results were statistically significant (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1683 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“In conclusion, L. camara leaf powder significantly inhibits seed germination, speed of germination, shoot and root length, stem thickness and biomass of wheat and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize germination index was 1.9 cm at T1 with L. camara leaf powder.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
L. camara leaf powdere2
Interactor
L. camaraLantana camarae2other
Outcome
germination indexe1
Value
1.9 cme1
Qualifier
at T1e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The germination index of wheat and maize was 5 cm and 1.9 cm, respectively at T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–957 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil without adding L. camara leaf powder was considered as control (T0) and T1, T2 and T3 were mixed with 25, 50 and 75 g of L. camara leaf powder, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–583 · show in text ↑

Lantana camara · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Lantana camara · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

botanical · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 57 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

botanical · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 56 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

228 papers in the same direction as this paper · 206 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.