Paper · 2019 · Archives of Microbiology

Antifungal activity of selected essential oils against Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum and their secondary metabolites in wheat seeds

Adam Perczak; Daniela Gwiazdowska; Katarzyna Marchwińska; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
111
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Essential oils (EOs) are products of plant origin and include mixtures of different chemical compounds. These volatile substances have many interesting properties, including antifungal properties. Fungi may develop under field conditions on crops such as wheat or corn and are able to synthesize mycotoxins, which adversely affect livestock and human health. In the present study, selected EOs were used to inhibit the growth of Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum and reduce the concentrations of mycotoxins in wheat grain. The EOs significantly inhibited the growth of tested Fusarium species (90.99-99.99%), as determined based on ergosterol quantitative analysis. Only the addition of orange oil to F. culmorum exhibits a different inhibition capacity (68.13%). EO application resulted in a large reduction in zearalenone content (99.08-99.99%); only in the case of orange oil application was the reduction estimated at approximately 68.33%. However, all EOs provided a significant reduction in the concentration levels of group B trichothecenes (94.51-100%). It can be concluded that EOs inhibit the growth of fungi of the genus Fusarium and reduce concentration levels of the mycotoxins zearalenone and group B trichothecenes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oils inhibited Fusarium graminearum growth by 90.99–99.99%.

Treatment
EOse0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume1pathogen
Outcome
growth of tested Fusarium speciese0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
90.99-99.99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EOs significantly inhibited the growth of tested Fusarium species (90.99-99.99%), as determined based on ergosterol quantitative analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum and reduce the concentrations of mycotoxins in wheat grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oils inhibited F. culmorum growth by 90.99–99.99%, apart from orange oil.

Treatment
EOse0
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume1pathogen
Outcome
growth of tested Fusarium speciese0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
90.99-99.99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EOs significantly inhibited the growth of tested Fusarium species (90.99-99.99%), as determined based on ergosterol quantitative analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum and reduce the concentrations of mycotoxins in wheat grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orange oil inhibited F. culmorum growth by 68.13%.

Treatment
orange oile0
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume0pathogen
Outcome
inhibition capacitye0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
68.13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only the addition of orange oil to F. culmorum exhibits a different inhibition capacity (68.13%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oils reduced zearalenone content by 99.08–99.99%.

Treatment
EO applicatione0
Outcome
zearalenone contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
99.08-99.99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EO application resulted in a large reduction in zearalenone content (99.08-99.99%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orange oil reduced zearalenone content by approximately 68.33%.

Treatment
orange oil applicatione0
Outcome
zearalenone contente1
Direction
reductione0
Value
approximately 68.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only in the case of orange oil application was the reduction estimated at approximately 68.33%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“EO application resulted in a large reduction in zearalenone content (99.08-99.99%); only in the case of orange oil application was the reduction estimated at approximately 68.33%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All essential oils significantly reduced group B trichothecene concentrations by 94.51–100%.

Treatment
EOse0
Outcome
concentration levels of group B trichothecenese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
94.51-100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all EOs provided a significant reduction in the concentration levels of group B trichothecenes (94.51-100%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–138 · show in text ↑

botanical · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

botanical · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 56 positive, 17 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

botanical · Fusarium culmorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.