Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Crude Fusarium extract significantly increased H2O2 and MDA content in both cultivars.

A claim from Physiological and molecular responses of resistant and susceptible wheat cultivars to Fusarium graminearum mycotoxin extract · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude Fusarium extract significantly increased H2O2 and MDA content in both cultivars.

Treatment
Point inoculation of crude extracte0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Point inoculation of crude extract in the wheat spikelets resulted in significant increases in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–688
t0

“Fusarium graminearum mycotoxin extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–124

Title

Physiological and molecular responses of resistant and susceptible wheat cultivars to Fusarium graminearum mycotoxin extract

Mona Sorahinobar; Hassan Soltanloo; Vahid Niknam; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 2017. doi:10.1080/07060661.2017.1379442

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-3fe290cee1fa1bcf59e5f9fae02daff8b9d0ab2e3728b7a319f8016848afd220 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

botanical · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Essential oils inhibited Fusarium graminearum growth by 90.99–99.99%.

    Antifungal activity of selected essential oils against Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum and their secondary metabolites in wheat seeds · 2019

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    A mixture of Coriandrum sativum essential oil with Satureja hortensis essential oil increased the antifungal effect against Fusarium graminearum on wheat seeds.

    Exploring Ecological Alternatives for Crop Protection Using Coriandrum sativum Essential Oil · 2019

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    In vitro, co-inoculation with the M20 extract inhibited growth of four F. graminearum strains by up to 48.5%.

    Biocontrol of Fusarium graminearum, a Causal Agent of Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat, and Deoxynivalenol Accumulation: From In Vitro to In Planta · 2022

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    At 2%, the botanicals inhibited fungal mycelium growth in vitro more than fungicide F.

    Control of Fusarium graminearum in Wheat With Mustard-Based Botanicals: From in vitro to in planta · 2020 · compared with prothioconazole fungicide (F)

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Redworm extracts significantly inhibited mycelial growth of Fusarium graminearum in vitro.

    Effect of Redworm Extracts against Fusarium Root Rot during Wheat Seedling Emergence · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Spirulina extract inhibited fungal biomass by 25% in vitro.

    Impact of microalgal phenolic extracts on the control of Fusarium graminearum and deoxynivalenol contamination in wheat · 2019 · compared with untreated control

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Tamarix extract controlled F. graminearum in wheat grain at 375 µg·mL−1.

    Phytochemical Profile and Activity against Fusarium Species of Tamarix gallica Bark Aqueous Ammonia Extract · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Culture supernatant and crude butanol extract inhibited mycelial growth of F. graminearum.

    IDENTIFICATION OF CYCLO(L-PRO-D-TYR) FROM BACILLUS AMYLOLIQUEFACIENS Y1 EXHIBITING ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY AGAINST FUSARIUM GRAMINEARUM TO CONTROL CROWN ROT IN WHEAT · 2019

    Opposite direction

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 14 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Strain ACM941 sprayed on wheat heads before inoculation reduced infected spikelets by 64% in greenhouse experiments.

    Biological control of fusarium head blight of wheat withClonostachys roseastrain ACM941 · 2009

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Twenty bacterial strains strongly inhibited F. graminearum growth, with dual-culture plate inhibition rates of 41.41% to 54.55%.

    Biocontrol of Fusarium graminearum Growth and Deoxynivalenol Production in Wheat Kernels with Bacterial Antagonists · 2014

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Eight proteins were induced or upregulated in inoculated Fhb1 positive wheat versus mock inoculation.

    Differentially Expressed Proteins Associated with Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat · 2013 · compared with mock-inoculated Fhb1(+) NIL

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Inoculating wheat kernels with B. mojavensis reduced seedling blight caused by Fusarium.

    Potential for control of seedling blight of wheat caused byFusarium graminearumand related species using the bacterial endophyteBacillus mojavensis · 2007

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Endophytes significantly increased wheat seed weight relative to infected heads without pretreatment.

    Endophytic Fungi as a Promising Biocontrol Agent to Protect Wheat from Fusarium graminearum Head Blight · 2021 · compared with F. graminearum-infected wheat heads without endophyte pretreatment

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Fungicide efficacy against F. graminearum was higher when applied 1 or 4 days before inoculation than at 7 or 10 days before or 3 or 5 days after inoculation.

    Efficacy of Fungicides against Fusarium Head Blight Depends on the Timing Relative to Infection Rather than on Wheat Growth Stage · 2021 · compared with 7 or 10 days before or 3 or 5 days after inoculation

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    YZ1 inoculation raised survival of Fusarium-infected wheat seedlings from 0% to over 60% in a glasshouse.

    A potent endophytic fungus Purpureocillium lilacinumYZ1 protects against Fusarium infection in field‐grown wheat · 2024 · compared with 0%

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Co-cultures of Bacillus subtilis OH 131.1 and Cryptococcus flavescens OH 182.9 reduced disease symptoms in wheat relative to the control in greenhouse assays.

    Genomic analysis of Bacillus subtilis OH 131.1 and co-culturing with Cryptococcus flavescens for control of Fusarium head blight · 2015 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.