Abstract
Genotype-environment interactions (GEI) were assessed in 10 cherry tomato accessions in nine environments, including four artificial settings (0, 60 120, and 180 kg ha-1 of potassium) established on the experimental farms Montelindo (Palestina), Tesorito (Manizales), and CEUNP (Palmira) (Colombia). The plant material included 10 cherry tomato genotypes obtained from the germplasm bank at the Instituto Agronómico de Campinas and Tomato Genetics Resources Center (TGRC). A completely randomized block design with four blocks corresponding to the level of potassium fertilization was used (0, 60, 120, 180 kg ha-1); 0 kg ha-1 was the level reported for the soil. The effective size of the experiment unit was seven plants; the plot included the five central plants. A distance of 1.5 m between rows, 0.50 m between plants, and 2 m between blocks was used. The contents of soluble solids (°Brix), vitamin C (mg/100 g fresh weight), and lycopene (µg g-1 fresh weight) were assessed. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences (P<0.01) between the tomato genotypes, environments, and G×E interactions for the three assessed traits . The AMMI analysis identified similar and contrasting environments and determined the genotypes that contributed the most to the GEI. The environments with 120 and 180 kg ha-1 potassium favored the expression of vitamin C, while Palmira favored the lycopene content. The findings are useful for identifying optimal locations and elite genotypes that can be used as sources of variability in fruit quality improvement programs for cherry tomatoes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes, environments, and their interactions differed significantly for soluble solids, vitamin C and lycopene.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- tomato genotypese0
- Outcome
- three assessed traitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences (P<0.01) between the tomato genotypes, environments, and G×E interactions for the three assessed traits”
Claim · model-written summary
AMMI identified similar and contrasting environments and genotypes contributing most to GEI.
- Taxon
- cherry tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformet0
- Outcome
- similar and contrasting environmentse0
- Comparator
- genotypese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The AMMI analysis identified similar and contrasting environments and determined the genotypes that contributed the most to the GEI”
t0“cherry tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium at 120 and 180 kg ha-1 favored vitamin C expression.
- Taxon
- cherry tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformet0
- Treatment
- 120 and 180 kg ha-1 potassiume0
- Outcome
- expression of vitamin Ce0
- Direction
- favorede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The environments with 120 and 180 kg ha-1 potassium favored the expression of vitamin C”
t0“cherry tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Palmira favored lycopene content.
- Taxon
- cherry tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformet0
- Outcome
- lycopene contente0
- Direction
- favorede0
- Setting
- Palmirae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while Palmira favored the lycopene content”
t0“cherry tomatoes”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.