Paper · 2021 · Crop and Pasture Science

Genetics of physiological and agronomical traits linked to salinity tolerance in tomato

Mohammad Moradi; Hamid Dehghani; Sied Zabihallah Ravari

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Improvement of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) for growth in saline soils is a major goal of tomato breeders. The aim of this study was to identify the genetic combining ability and genetics of salinity tolerance in tomato. Plant materials were grown under normal (NG) and salinity stress (SSG) conditions. Results showed that the genetic controlling mechanism of salinity-related traits and fruit weight is complex and that all genetic components of additive, non-additive and maternal are involved. The nature of gene action for fruit weight and salinity-related traits was significantly affected by salinity stress. Dominance and additive gene action were predominant under NG and SSG, respectively. Under NG, the best general combiner parent for fruit weight was P3 (salt-tolerant with moderate fruit yield). Under SSG, P1 (highly salt-tolerant with low fruit yield) was the best general combiner parent for fruit weight and exhibited high genetic combining ability for K+/Na+, lipoxygenase activity, proline, relative water content, total carbohydrate and cell membrane stability. With the high frequency of genes effective in salt tolerance, the P1 parent appeared as the best specific mating partner with other parents under SSG. Simultaneous selection for fruit weight and surrogate traits (cell membrane stability, proline and relative water content) in a population derived from the P1 × P5 (susceptible with high fruit yield) cross could result in a salt-tolerant tomato genotype.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additive, nonadditive and maternal components contribute to salinity traits and fruit weight.

Outcome
additive, non-additive and maternale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all genetic components of additive, non-additive and maternal are involved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity stress significantly affected gene action for fruit weight and salinity traits.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
nature of gene action for fruit weight and salinity-related traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nature of gene action for fruit weight and salinity-related traits was significantly affected by salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominance gene action predominated under normal growth.

Outcome
Dominancee0
Setting
NGe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dominance and additive gene action were predominant under NG and SSG, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additive gene action predominated under salinity stress.

Outcome
additive gene actione0
Setting
SSGe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dominance and additive gene action were predominant under NG and SSG, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 was the best general combining parent for fruit weight under normal growth.

Material
P3e0
Outcome
general combiner parent for fruit weighte0
Direction
beste0
Setting
NGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under NG, the best general combiner parent for fruit weight was P3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P1 was the best general combining parent for fruit weight under salinity stress.

Material
P1e0
Outcome
general combiner parent for fruit weighte0
Direction
beste0
Setting
SSGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under SSG, P1 (highly salt-tolerant with low fruit yield) was the best general combiner parent for fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P1 had high combining ability for K+/Na+, lipoxygenase activity and proline.

Material
P1e0
Outcome
genetic combining ability for K+/Na+, lipoxygenase activity, prolinee0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P1 (highly salt-tolerant with low fruit yield) was the best general combiner parent for fruit weight and exhibited high genetic combining ability for K+/Na+, lipoxygenase activity, proline, relative water content, total carbohydrate and cell membrane stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P1 had high combining ability for relative water content, total carbohydrate and membrane stability.

Material
P1e0
Outcome
relative water content, total carbohydrate and cell membrane stabilitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P1 (highly salt-tolerant with low fruit yield) was the best general combiner parent for fruit weight and exhibited high genetic combining ability for K+/Na+, lipoxygenase activity, proline, relative water content, total carbohydrate and cell membrane stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P1 appeared the best specific mating partner under salinity stress.

Material
P1e0
Outcome
best specific mating partnere0
Direction
beste0
Setting
SSGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the P1 parent appeared as the best specific mating partner with other parents under SSG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting fruit weight and surrogate traits in the P1 by P5 cross may produce salt tolerant tomato.

Material
P1 × P5e0
Outcome
salt-tolerant tomato genotypee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simultaneous selection for fruit weight and surrogate traits (cell membrane stability, proline and relative water content) in a population derived from the P1 × P5 (susceptible with high fruit yield) cross could result in a salt-tolerant tomato genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1494 · show in text ↑