Paper · 2021 · Plant Genetic Resources

Evaluation of high-yielding wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties under water limitation

Mueen Alam Khan; Hafiz Muhammad Faisal Umer; Muhammad Iqbal; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Drought tolerance is a highly complex trait and one of the important components of yield stability in wheat. An experiment was therefore conducted to study the drought tolerance status of 14 high-yielding wheat varieties based on morphological characteristics under a randomized complete block design following factorial arrangement with three replications. Variety × Treatment × Year interactions of wheat genotypes were studied for various morphological traits under normal and drought stress conditions for 2 years in plants grown in pots. Significant differences were observed among the 14 varieties of wheat. Sutlej-86 was found to be highly affected by drought, with maximum reductions in plant height, spike length and number of spikelets/spike. The variety with the maximum tolerance to drought was Bahawalpur-97; this variety also had the lowest reductions in the number of fertile tillers/plant, the number of spikelets/spike, spike weight, the number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield/spike, total biomass and stress susceptibility and tolerance indices. Stronger correlations among the studied attributes under drought stress over normal conditions further highlighted drought stress adversities. The studied traits are thus recognized as drought tolerance indicators for varietal selection, and varieties showing less reduction under drought could be used as a standard check in breeding programmes to identify lineages with drought tolerance and could be recommended for drought-stressed areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 14 wheat varieties differed significantly.

Outcome
differencese0
Value
14e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were observed among the 14 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sutlej-86 had the greatest drought reductions in height, spike length and spikelets per spike.

Material
Sutlej-86e0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
plant height, spike length and number of spikelets/spikee0
Direction
maximum reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sutlej-86 was found to be highly affected by drought, with maximum reductions in plant height, spike length and number of spikelets/spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bahawalpur-97 had the highest drought tolerance.

Material
Bahawalpur-97e0
Outcome
maximum tolerance to droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variety with the maximum tolerance to drought was Bahawalpur-97”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bahawalpur-97 had the smallest declines across tiller, spike, grain and biomass traits and stress indices.

Material
Bahawalpur-97e1
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
number of fertile tillers/plant, the number of spikelets/spike, spike weight, the number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield/spike, total biomass and stress susceptibility and tolerance indicese0
Direction
lowest reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this variety also had the lowest reductions in the number of fertile tillers/plant, the number of spikelets/spike, spike weight, the number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield/spike, total biomass and stress susceptibility and tolerance indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1087 · show in text ↑
e1

“The variety with the maximum tolerance to drought was Bahawalpur-97”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Correlations among traits were stronger under drought than normal conditions.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
correlations among the studied attributese0
Direction
Strongere0
Comparator
normal conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stronger correlations among the studied attributes under drought stress over normal conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–56 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify the traits as selection indicators and recommend low-reduction varieties as breeding checks for drought areas.

Outcome
standard check in breeding programmese0
Qualifier
drought-stressed arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The studied traits are thus recognized as drought tolerance indicators for varietal selection, and varieties showing less reduction under drought could be used as a standard check in breeding programmes to identify lineages with drought tolerance and could be recommended for drought-stressed areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–56 · show in text ↑

drought · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 22 positive, 13 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.