Paper · 2020

Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and quality of Garlic cv. Yamuna Safed-3: Effect of INM on garlic yield and quality

A B Priyanshu; Manoj Kumar Singh; Mukesh Kumar; et al.

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Horticultural Research Centre, SVP University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut (UP) during Rabi season of 2018-19 to assess the impact of different INM doses in relation to yield and quality parameters in garlic. Total ten treatments which included different combinations of inorganic fertilizers, organic fertilizers and bio-fertilizers like T1 - (Control), T2 RDF (100:50:50 kg NPK ha-1), T3-RDF + 20 kg sulphur + FYM 20 ton ha-1, T4 - RDF + 20 kg sulphur + VC 4 ton ha-1, T5- 75% RDF + 40 kg sulphur + 5 ton FYM ha-1+ PSB 5 kg ha-1, T6 -75% RDF + 40 kg sulphur + 2 ton VC + Azotobacter 5 kg ha-1, T7 - 75% RDF + 40 kg sulphur + FYM 3 ton + VC 1 ton + PSB 5 kg + Azotobacter 5 kg ha-1, T8 - 50% RDF + 40 kg sulphur + FYM 5 ton + VC 2 ton + PSB 5 kg ha-1, T9 - 50% RDF + 40 kg sulphur + FYM 5 ton + VC 2 ton + Azotobacter 5 kg ha-1and T10 - 50% RDF + 40 kg sulphur + FYM 5 ton + VC 2 ton + PSB 5 kg + Azotobacter 5 kg ha-1 were used in Randomized Block Design and replicated thrice. Out of these an application of T7 (75% RDF + 40 kg sulphur + FYM 3 ton + VC 1 ton ha-1 + PSB 5 kg + Azotobacter 5 kg ha-1) was found to be significantly superior in term of yield and attributing parameters of garlic.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 was significantly superior for garlic yield and attributing parameters.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Material
Yamuna Safed-3t0
Treatment
T7 (75% RDF + 40 kg sulphur + FYM 3 ton + VC 1 ton ha-1 + PSB 5 kg + Azotobacter 5 kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
yield and attributing parameters of garlice0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Garlic cv. Yamuna Safed-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“an application of T7 (75% RDF + 40 kg sulphur + FYM 3 ton + VC 1 ton ha-1 + PSB 5 kg + Azotobacter 5 kg ha-1) was found to be significantly superior in term of yield and attributing parameters of garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1235 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.