Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Bio-Inoculants and Graded Level of Fertilizers on Nutrient Uptake in Garlic

Vikram Singh; K.C. Sharma; H.R. Sharma

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2014-15 to investigate the effect of different levels of bio- inoculants (Azotobacter and PSB) in combination with four levels of NPK fertilizers on yield and nutrient uptake of garlic cv. ‘GHC-1’. The increased bulb yield was to the tune of 25.86%, 12.99% and 9.81% with the combination of bio- inoculants (Azotobacter + PSB), PSB and Azotobacter, respectively over un-inoculated control. The highest bulb yield (20 t ha-1) was recorded when the plots were supplemented with 100% NPK + garlic cloves dipping of both the inoculants. The result further showed that Azotobacter and PSB +100 % RDF inorganic recorded higher nutrient uptake of NPK as compared to other treatment combinations. Bio-inoculants amendment in combination with synthetic fertilizers also improved the soil buildup over the initial soil status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Azotobacter and PSB inoculation increased garlic bulb yield by 25.86% over the uninoculated control.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
bio- inoculants (Azotobacter + PSB)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.86%e0
Comparator
un-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutrient Uptake in Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increased bulb yield was to the tune of 25.86%, 12.99% and 9.81% with the combination of bio- inoculants (Azotobacter + PSB), PSB and Azotobacter, respectively over un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB inoculation alone increased garlic bulb yield by 12.99% over the uninoculated control.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
PSBe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.99%e0
Comparator
un-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutrient Uptake in Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increased bulb yield was to the tune of 25.86%, 12.99% and 9.81% with the combination of bio- inoculants (Azotobacter + PSB), PSB and Azotobacter, respectively over un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation alone increased garlic bulb yield by 9.81% over the uninoculated control.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.81%e0
Comparator
un-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutrient Uptake in Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increased bulb yield was to the tune of 25.86%, 12.99% and 9.81% with the combination of bio- inoculants (Azotobacter + PSB), PSB and Azotobacter, respectively over un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest garlic bulb yield (20 t/ha) was recorded with 100% NPK plus clove dipping in both inoculants.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
100% NPK + garlic cloves dipping of both the inoculantse1
Outcome
bulb yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
20 t ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutrient Uptake in Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest bulb yield (20 t ha-1) was recorded when the plots were supplemented with 100% NPK + garlic cloves dipping of both the inoculants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter and PSB with 100% RDF inorganic fertilizer gave higher nutrient uptake of NPK than other treatment combinations.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Azotobacter and PSB +100 % RDF inorganice2
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere2symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe2symbiont
Outcome
nutrient uptake of NPKe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other treatment combinationse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutrient Uptake in Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“The result further showed that Azotobacter and PSB +100 % RDF inorganic recorded higher nutrient uptake of NPK as compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-inoculants combined with synthetic fertilizers improved soil buildup over the initial soil status.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Bio-inoculants amendment in combination with synthetic fertilizerse3
Outcome
soil buildupe3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
initial soil statuse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutrient Uptake in Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Bio-inoculants amendment in combination with synthetic fertilizers also improved the soil buildup over the initial soil status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–870 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

inoculation · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 29 positive, 1 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 58 positive, 1 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.