Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of bio-regulators and bio-fertilizers on quality of garlic (Allium sativum L.)

Ganpat Lal Yadav; SP Singh; Govind Kumar Yadav; et al.

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Horticulture Farm, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner (Jaipur) during Rabi season 2016-17 and 2017-2018. The experiment consisting four bio-fertilizers (control, Azotobacter, PGPR (Pseudomonas) and Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) and five bio-regulators (control, Thiourea @ 500 ppm, Thiourea @ 1000 ppm, salicylic acid @ 100 ppm and mepiquat chloride @ 100 ppm). The total 20 treatment combinations were tested in split-plot design with three replications. It was observed that the application of bio-fertilizers, Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) and foliar application of thiourea @ 1000 ppm to the garlic crop significantly increased the Sulphur content, nitrogen content, phosphorus content, potassium content and total soluble solids in bulb as compared to control being statistically at par with application of thiourea @ 500 ppm and salicylic acid @ 100 ppm. combined application of Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) along with thiourea @ 1000 ppm proved to be most superior treatment combination, followed by Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) along with thiourea @ 500 ppm and Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) along with salicylic acid @ 100 ppm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizers and foliar thiourea at 1000 ppm significantly increased sulphur, nitrogen and phosphorus content in garlic bulb compared with control.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Organ / stage
bulbe1
Treatment
application of bio-fertilizers, Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) and foliar application of thiourea @ 1000 ppme1
Outcome
Sulphur content, nitrogen content, phosphorus contente1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Qualifier
statistically at par with application of thiourea @ 500 ppm and salicylic acid @ 100 ppme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“quality of garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“It was observed that the application of bio-fertilizers, Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) and foliar application of thiourea @ 1000 ppm to the garlic crop significantly increased the Sulphur content, nitrogen content, phosphorus content, potassium content and total soluble solids in bulb as compared to control being statistically at par with application of thiourea @ 500 ppm and salicylic acid @ 100 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizers and foliar thiourea at 1000 ppm significantly increased potassium content and total soluble solids in garlic bulb compared with control.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Organ / stage
bulbe1
Treatment
application of bio-fertilizers, Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) and foliar application of thiourea @ 1000 ppme1
Outcome
potassium content and total soluble solidse1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“quality of garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“It was observed that the application of bio-fertilizers, Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) and foliar application of thiourea @ 1000 ppm to the garlic crop significantly increased the Sulphur content, nitrogen content, phosphorus content, potassium content and total soluble solids in bulb as compared to control being statistically at par with application of thiourea @ 500 ppm and salicylic acid @ 100 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Azotobacter + PGPR with thiourea at 1000 ppm was the most superior treatment combination for garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
combined application of Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) along with thiourea @ 1000 ppme2
Outcome
most superior treatment combinatione2
Direction
most superiore2
Comparator
Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) along with thiourea @ 500 ppme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“quality of garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“combined application of Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) along with thiourea @ 1000 ppm proved to be most superior treatment combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1042 · show in text ↑
e3

“followed by Azotobacter + PGPR (Pseudomonas) along with thiourea @ 500 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1118 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thiourea · quality: sugar starch · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · nutrient: content · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azotobacter · quality: sugar starch · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.