Paper · 2020 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Effect of Phosphorus Fertilization and Psb on Garlic Quality under Organic Farming System

K. F. Fouda

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken in complete randomized design with three replicates during winter season of 2017/2018 to study the effect of phosphorus fertilization (50, 75 and 100 % from recommended dose), Phosphate Solublizing Bacteria (PSB) and chicken manure on growth criteria , chemical traits, bulb quality and yield of garlic plants. The findings showed that growth criteria such as plant height, No. of leaves, fresh and dry weight of whole plant and its leaves, neck and bulb, yield and its components (number of clovers/bulb, bulb diameter, neck diameter, average cloves and bulb as well as total Mg/fed), chemical content (N, P and K %) and quality parameters (TSS%, total carbohydrates, crude fiber, vitamin C, dry matter, volatile oil and allicin) as well as availability of N, P and K recorded the highest values with plant treated with 75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% P fertilization plus PSB plus chicken manure treatment gave the highest garlic plant growth and bulb size traits.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manuree1
Interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
plant height, No. of leaves, fresh and dry weight of whole plant and its leaves, neck and bulbe0
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth criteria such as plant height, No. of leaves, fresh and dry weight of whole plant and its leaves, neck and bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–495 · show in text ↑
e1

“recorded the highest values with plant treated with 75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination gave the highest garlic yield and components.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manuree1
Interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
yield and its components (number of clovers/bulb, bulb diameter, neck diameter, average cloves and bulb as well as total Mg/fed)e0
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and its components (number of clovers/bulb, bulb diameter, neck diameter, average cloves and bulb as well as total Mg/fed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–625 · show in text ↑
e1

“recorded the highest values with plant treated with 75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination gave the highest garlic N, P and K content and availability.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manuree1
Interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
availability of N, P and Ke1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chemical content (N, P and K %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“availability of N, P and K recorded the highest values with plant treated with 75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination gave the highest garlic soluble solids, carbohydrates and fiber.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manuree0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
TSS%, total carbohydrates, crude fibere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters (TSS%, total carbohydrates, crude fiber, vitamin C, dry matter, volatile oil and allicin) as well as availability of N, P and K recorded the highest values with plant treated with 75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination gave the highest garlic vitamin C, dry matter and volatile oil.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manuree0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
vitamin C, dry matter, volatile oile0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters (TSS%, total carbohydrates, crude fiber, vitamin C, dry matter, volatile oil and allicin) as well as availability of N, P and K recorded the highest values with plant treated with 75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination gave the highest garlic allicin.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manuree0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
allicine0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters (TSS%, total carbohydrates, crude fiber, vitamin C, dry matter, volatile oil and allicin) as well as availability of N, P and K recorded the highest values with plant treated with 75% P fertilization+ PSB +Chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

32 papers: 31 positive, 1 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

8 of 18 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.