Paper · 2000 · HortScience

216 Carbohydrate and Alliin Concentrations in Garlic Produced under Different N Fertilzation and Irrigation Regimes

M. Cantwell; G. Hong; R. Voss; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Garlic (cv California Late) was produced under four irrigation regimes (110% and 130% evapotranspiration with two water cut-off dates, 10 and 24 May 1999) in combination with three nitrogen fertilization levels (100, 250, and 400 lb total N). Bulbs were manually harvested mid-June, cured 3 weeks shaded at ambient temperatures and the outer whorl of cloves manually peeled. Samples were freeze-dried, and carbohydrate (fructan and free sugars) and alliin (substrate for alliinase activity and indicator of potential pungency) concentrations were determined by HPLC. The percent dry weight was not affected by the irrigation treatment, but was reduced with increased N rate (41.3% to 39.0%). Alliin concentrations varied from 8.3 to 13.8 mg/g DW for 110% and 130% Et o irrigation treatments. Alliin concentrations were not affected by N fertilization (average = 11.5 mg/g DW). Fructan concentrations were affected by N fertilization treatment, with the highest content (802 mg/g DW) associated with the lowest N level, and the lowest (717 mg/g DW) content in samples from the highest N rate. Sucrose concentrations increased with increased N, but glucose and fructose concentrations did not vary with N fertilization. Fructan as percent of total carbohydrate remained constant across irrigation treatments (96.6% + 0.2%) and across N fertilization treatments (96.6% + 0.3%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation did not affect dry weight percentage.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
percent dry weighte0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent dry weight was not affected by the irrigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N reduced dry weight from 41.3% to 39.0%.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
increased N ratee0
Outcome
percent dry weighte1
Direction
reducede0
Value
41.3% to 39.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but was reduced with increased N rate (41.3% to 39.0%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“The percent dry weight was not affected by the irrigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alliin concentration varied from 8.3 to 13.8 mg/g DW between irrigation treatments.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
110% and 130% Et o irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
Alliin concentrationse0
Value
8.3 to 13.8 mg/g DWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alliin concentrations varied from 8.3 to 13.8 mg/g DW for 110% and 130% Et o irrigation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization did not affect alliin concentration, averaging 11.5 mg/g DW.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
Alliin concentrationse0
Direction
not affectede0
Value
11.5 mg/g DWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alliin concentrations were not affected by N fertilization (average = 11.5 mg/g DW).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fructan content was highest at the lowest N level, 802 mg/g DW.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
lowest N levele0
Outcome
highest contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
802 mg/g DWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the highest content (802 mg/g DW) associated with the lowest N level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fructan content was lowest at the highest N rate, 717 mg/g DW.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
highest N ratee0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0
Value
717 mg/g DWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest (717 mg/g DW) content in samples from the highest N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose concentration increased with N.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
increased Ne0
Outcome
Sucrose concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose concentrations increased with increased N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose and fructose concentrations did not vary with N.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
glucose and fructose concentrationse0
Direction
did not varye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glucose and fructose concentrations did not vary with N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fructan proportion remained constant across irrigation treatments at 96.6% + 0.2%.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
Fructan as percent of total carbohydratee0
Direction
remained constante0
Value
96.6% + 0.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fructan as percent of total carbohydrate remained constant across irrigation treatments (96.6% + 0.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fructan proportion remained constant across N treatments at 96.6% + 0.3%.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
N fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
Fructan as percent of total carbohydratee1
Direction
remained constante1
Value
96.6% + 0.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and across N fertilization treatments (96.6% + 0.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fructan as percent of total carbohydrate remained constant across irrigation treatments (96.6% + 0.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1320 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.