Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the response of garlic growth and yield to irrigation water. The garlic seeds using the southern ecotype garlic cultivar, ‘Namdo’. The cloves were planted on the polyethylene film-mulched plots at a planting density of 18 × 11 ㎝ in a greenhouse in September 2002 and harvested in May 2003. The irrigation levels during the experimental period were 30, 20, 10 ㎜ and no-irrigation. In April 30th, plant height and leaf area were 90-96 ㎝ and 415-492 ㎝²/plant under irrigated condition, while 82 ㎝ and 392 ㎝²/plant under water stressed condition, respectively, suggesting that leaf growth was largely inhibited by water deficiency. The distribution rate of large size of garlic bulbs (abov 45 ㎜ diameter) ranges 58.9-76.5% under irrigation, but 39.4% under water-stressed condition. The yield of garlic bulbs was not significant among the 30, 20, and 10 ㎜ irrigation level which was 1,344, 1,239 and 1,157 ㎏/10a, respectively. Overall, this study suggests that the yield of garlic bulbs was significantly decreased under no-irrigation condition.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigated garlic was taller than water stressed garlic at April 30.
- Taxon
- garlic
Allium sativumt0 - Treatment
- irrigated conditione0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Value
- 90-96 ㎝e0
- Comparator
- water stressed conditione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“garlic plants”
e0“plant height and leaf area were 90-96 ㎝ and 415-492 ㎝²/plant under irrigated condition, while 82 ㎝ and 392 ㎝²/plant under water stressed condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigated garlic had greater leaf area than water stressed garlic.
- Taxon
- garlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- irrigated conditione0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Value
- 415-492 ㎝²/plante0
- Comparator
- water stressed conditione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“garlic plants”
e0“plant height and leaf area were 90-96 ㎝ and 415-492 ㎝²/plant under irrigated condition, while 82 ㎝ and 392 ㎝²/plant under water stressed condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Large bulbs were more frequent with irrigation than under water stress.
- Taxon
- garlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- distribution rate of large size of garlic bulbse0
- Value
- 58.9-76.5%e0
- Comparator
- water-stressed conditione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“garlic plants”
e0“The distribution rate of large size of garlic bulbs (abov 45 ㎜ diameter) ranges 58.9-76.5% under irrigation, but 39.4% under water-stressed condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Bulb yield did not differ significantly among the 30, 20 and 10 mm irrigation levels.
- Taxon
- garlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- 30, 20, and 10 ㎜ irrigation levele0
- Outcome
- yield of garlic bulbse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“garlic plants”
e0“The yield of garlic bulbs was not significant among the 30, 20, and 10 ㎜ irrigation level which was 1,344, 1,239 and 1,157 ㎏/10a, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
No irrigation significantly reduced garlic bulb yield.
- Taxon
- garlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- no-irrigation conditione0
- Outcome
- yield of garlic bulbse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“garlic plants”
e0“the yield of garlic bulbs was significantly decreased under no-irrigation condition”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →irrigation · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.