Abstract
The effect of mycorrhizae species and phosphorus (P) fertilizer on garlic (Allium sativum L.) growth, yield–quality, and P uptake under high P accumulated non-sterile field conditions were studied. Experiments were conducted for two successive years under field conditions of Menzilat soil series (Typic xerofluvent) at the Research Farm of the University of Cukurova (Turkey). Glomus mosseae arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) were tested on local Urfa genotype of garlic at 0, 40, 80, and 120 kg phosphorus (P2O5) ha−1. In the first year, garlic was inoculated with 1,000 spores per plant, but in the second year, garlic was inoculated with either 1,000 or 2,000 spores per plant. Emergence, plant growth, yield, bulb size, root mycorrhizal infection, and phosphorus uptake of plants were examined. Neither mycorrhizal inoculation nor P2O5 supply increased garlic growth and yield. However, at 0 level of P2O5 application, mycorrhizal inoculation slightly increased plant P uptake. In the second year of the experiment, mycorrhizae significantly increased clove yield. The results revealed that although garlic is mycorrhizal dependent, mycorrhizal inoculation did not contribute to the plant growth and nutrient uptake.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation did not increase garlic growth and yield
- Taxon
- garlic
Allium sativume0 - Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculatione1
- Interactor
- Glomus mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee5symbiont
- Outcome
- growth and yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”
e1“Neither mycorrhizal inoculation nor P2O5 supply increased garlic growth and yield”
e5“Glomus mosseae arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM)”
Claim · model-written summary
P2O5 supply did not increase garlic growth and yield
- Taxon
- garlic
Allium sativume0 - Treatment
- P2O5 supplye1
- Outcome
- growth and yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”
e1“Neither mycorrhizal inoculation nor P2O5 supply increased garlic growth and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0 P2O5 application, mycorrhizal inoculation slightly increased plant P uptake in garlic
- Taxon
- garlic
Allium sativume0 - Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculatione2
- Interactor
- Glomus mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee5symbiont
- Outcome
- plant P uptakee2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Qualifier
- at 0 level of P2O5 applicatione2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”
e2“at 0 level of P2O5 application, mycorrhizal inoculation slightly increased plant P uptake”
e5“Glomus mosseae arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizae significantly increased garlic clove yield in the second year
- Taxon
- garlic
Allium sativume0 - Treatment
- mycorrhizaee3
- Interactor
- Glomus mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee5symbiont
- Outcome
- clove yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Qualifier
- second year of the experimente3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”
e3“In the second year of the experiment, mycorrhizae significantly increased clove yield”
e5“Glomus mosseae arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation did not contribute to nutrient uptake in garlic
- Taxon
- garlic
Allium sativume0 - Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculatione4
- Interactor
- Glomus mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee5symbiont
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee4
- Direction
- did not contributee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”
e4“mycorrhizal inoculation did not contribute to the plant growth and nutrient uptake”
e5“Glomus mosseae arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM)”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ
31 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.