Paper · 2019 · Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara)

Measurement and sensing of cover crop growth and nitrogen credits in conservation agriculture.

Luca Bechini; Mortadha Ben Hassine; Domenico Ditto; et al.

20
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We studied cover crops in maize-based cropping systems in the agricultural plain areas of Northern Italy (Lombardia region), to: quantify the growth of winter cover crops, nitrogen uptake, weed control capacity, and nitrogen credits for maize; to test the possibility of sensing cover crop biomass and nitrogen (N) concentration using aerial images, and to estimate N concentration using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS); and to quantify cover crop cultivation costs. We set up six experiments to compare different cover crop species in rotation with maize. The experiments started in September 2017 and ended in August 2019. Cover crop growth in autumn was rapid for white mustard, tillage radish and black oat (which accumulated 1.5–3.0 t DM/ha until November), while legume cover crops (Egyptian clover, hairy vetch and purple vetch) had a lower crop growth rate (reaching 0.5–1.5 t DM/ha). Therefore, non-legume cover crops controlled weeds better compared to legume cover crops. Nitrogen uptake in autumn was highest for white mustard, tillage radish and hairy vetch (77-125 kg N/ha). Rye and black oat were intermediate, while Egyptian clover and purple vetch were lowest (35 kg N/ha). Rye and hairy vetch survived winter, while white mustard was always destroyed by winter frosts. We did not observe relevant effects of cover crops on maize yield and N uptake. In one experiment, we also established relationships between vegetation indices (NDVI, Normalised Difference Vegetation Index; and CIg, Chlorophyll Index) obtained with a multispectral digital camera carried by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and cover crop biomass and nitrogen concentration. Increasing biomass above about 1 and 2 t DM/ha for NDVI and CIg, respectively, did not correspond to increasing values of the indices, thus reducing their predictive capacity. A new index (calculated using measured crop height) improved the predictions of cover crop biomass substantially (R2 = 0.64–0.86). Cover crop nitrogen concentration was poorly predicted by the vegetation indices. We finally scanned cover crops with two NIR instruments, and used the spectra for chemometric elaborations (Partial Least Squares regression). Predictions of N concentrations on spectra of fresh materials were rather poor, while dried and ground samples provided better results (R2 = 0.86 for the bench instrument, and 0.70 for the portable instrument). Locally Weighted Regression further improved the R2 (0.90 and 0.84, respectively). Cultivation costs ranged between 112 €/ha for white mustard (a winter killed species that does not require termination and has a low seed cost) and 208 €/ha for rye (winter-hardy, with more expensive seed).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White mustard, tillage radish and black oat accumulated 1.5–3.0 t DM/ha by November.

Taxon
white mustard, tillage radish and black oate0
Outcome
Cover crop growthe0
Direction
rapide0
Value
1.5–3.0 t DM/hae0
Qualifier
until Novembere0

Verbatim

e0

“Cover crop growth in autumn was rapid for white mustard, tillage radish and black oat (which accumulated 1.5–3.0 t DM/ha until November)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–763 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Egyptian clover, hairy vetch and purple vetch reached 0.5–1.5 t DM/ha with lower growth rate.

Taxon
Egyptian clover, hairy vetch and purple vetche0
Outcome
crop growth ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.5–1.5 t DM/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“legume cover crops (Egyptian clover, hairy vetch and purple vetch) had a lower crop growth rate (reaching 0.5–1.5 t DM/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–893 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-legume cover crops controlled weeds better than legume cover crops.

Taxon
non-legume cover cropse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled weedse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
legume cover cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“non-legume cover crops controlled weeds better compared to legume cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White mustard, tillage radish and hairy vetch had the highest autumn nitrogen uptake at 77-125 kg N/ha.

Taxon
white mustard, tillage radish and hairy vetche0
Outcome
Nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
77-125 kg N/hae0
Qualifier
autumne0

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen uptake in autumn was highest for white mustard, tillage radish and hairy vetch (77-125 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1089 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye and black oat had intermediate nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
Rye and black oatSecale cerealeAvena strigosae0
Outcome
intermediatee0
Direction
intermediatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena strigosa
Avena strigosa · TaxonMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rye and black oat were intermediate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Egyptian clover and purple vetch had the lowest nitrogen uptake at 35 kg N/ha.

Taxon
Egyptian clover and purple vetche0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0
Value
35 kg N/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian clover and purple vetch were lowest (35 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1191 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye and hairy vetch survived winter.

Taxon
Rye and hairy vetchVicia villosaSecale cerealee0
Outcome
survived wintere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rye and hairy vetch survived winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1228 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White mustard was always killed by winter frost.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albae0
Outcome
destroyed by winter frostse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“white mustard was always destroyed by winter frosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops had no relevant effect on maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
cover cropse0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
did not observe relevant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We did not observe relevant effects of cover crops on maize yield and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops had no relevant effect on maize nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
cover cropse0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
did not observe relevant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We did not observe relevant effects of cover crops on maize yield and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1367 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI saturation above about 1 t DM/ha reduced its biomass prediction capacity.

Taxon
cover cropt0
Outcome
predictive capacitye0
Value
about 1e0
Comparator
NDVIe0

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing biomass above about 1 and 2 t DM/ha for NDVI and CIg, respectively, did not correspond to increasing values of the indices, thus reducing their predictive capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1832 · show in text ↑
t0

“cover crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIg saturation above about 2 t DM/ha reduced its biomass prediction capacity.

Taxon
cover cropt0
Outcome
predictive capacitye0
Value
2 t DM/hae0
Comparator
CIge0

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing biomass above about 1 and 2 t DM/ha for NDVI and CIg, respectively, did not correspond to increasing values of the indices, thus reducing their predictive capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1832 · show in text ↑
t0

“cover crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An index using measured crop height improved biomass predictions with R2 0.64–0.86.

Taxon
cover crope0
Outcome
predictions of cover crop biomasse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
R2 = 0.64–0.86e0
Comparator
new indexe0

Verbatim

e0

“A new index (calculated using measured crop height) improved the predictions of cover crop biomass substantially (R2 = 0.64–0.86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1963 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetation indices poorly predicted cover crop nitrogen concentration.

Taxon
Cover crope0
Outcome
nitrogen concentratione0
Comparator
vegetation indicese0

Verbatim

e0

“Cover crop nitrogen concentration was poorly predicted by the vegetation indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2045 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spectral predictions of nitrogen concentration from fresh samples were poor.

Taxon
cover cropt0
Outcome
Predictions of N concentrationse0
Comparator
fresh materialse0

Verbatim

e0

“Predictions of N concentrations on spectra of fresh materials were rather poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2190–2268 · show in text ↑
t0

“cover crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried, ground samples yielded better NIRS nitrogen predictions, with R2 0.86 for the bench instrument.

Taxon
cover cropt0
Outcome
better resultse0
Direction
bettere0
Value
R2 = 0.86e0
Comparator
bench instrumente0

Verbatim

e0

“dried and ground samples provided better results (R2 = 0.86 for the bench instrument, and 0.70 for the portable instrument)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2276–2399 · show in text ↑
t0

“cover crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried, ground samples yielded R2 0.70 with the portable instrument.

Taxon
cover cropt0
Outcome
better resultse0
Direction
bettere0
Value
0.70e0
Comparator
portable instrumente0

Verbatim

e0

“dried and ground samples provided better results (R2 = 0.86 for the bench instrument, and 0.70 for the portable instrument)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2276–2399 · show in text ↑
t0

“cover crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Locally Weighted Regression improved bench instrument R2 to 0.90.

Taxon
cover cropt0
Outcome
R2e0
Direction
improvede0
Value
0.90e0
Comparator
Locally Weighted Regressione0

Verbatim

e0

“Locally Weighted Regression further improved the R2 (0.90 and 0.84, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2401–2482 · show in text ↑
t0

“cover crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Locally Weighted Regression improved portable instrument R2 to 0.84.

Taxon
cover cropt0
Outcome
R2e0
Direction
improvede0
Value
0.84e0
Comparator
Locally Weighted Regressione0

Verbatim

e0

“Locally Weighted Regression further improved the R2 (0.90 and 0.84, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2401–2482 · show in text ↑
t0

“cover crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation cost ranged from 112 €/ha for white mustard to 208 €/ha for rye.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albae0
Outcome
Cultivation costse0
Value
112 €/hae0
Qualifier
208 €/hae0
Comparator
ryee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation costs ranged between 112 €/ha for white mustard (a winter killed species that does not require termination and has a low seed cost) and 208 €/ha for rye (winter-hardy, with more expensive seed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2484–2689 · show in text ↑

cover crop · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.