Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Standardization of Regeneration Protocol in Wheat-Rye Crosses from Immature Embryos

P. N. Jagadev V. K. Khanna

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to standardize the embryo culture technique for plant regeneration from immature embryos in wheat-rye crosses. Embryo rescue was tried to obtain the hybrid plants. At 17-19 days after pollination, the frequency of embryo development showed that wheat cvs. Hope and Highbury were incompatible with both rye cvs. (Russian rye and Rye 8461), while UP 2338 and WH 896 were incompatible with Russian rye only. The compatibility was the highest in the cross of Chinese Spring (CS) with Russian rye. The embryos were cultured on two media combinations, viz., Taira and Larter’s modified Norstog’s (TL1 medium) and TL1 medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/l of naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) and 1.0 mg/l Kinetin (6-furfuryl amino purine) (TL2 medium) following Taira and Larter (1978). Maximum embryo survival (85.0 %) was observed in CS and CS/Hope 5B crosses with Russian rye, when cultured on Taira and Larter’s modified Norstog’s medium. Hence, it was found that Taira and Larter’s modified Norstog’s medium was the best for plant regeneration studies in wheat-rye crosses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hope was incompatible with both rye cvs. (Russian rye and Rye 8461).

Material
Hopee0
Outcome
incompatible with both rye cvs. (Russian rye and Rye 8461)e0
Qualifier
17-19 days after pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 17-19 days after pollination, the frequency of embryo development showed that wheat cvs. Hope and Highbury were incompatible with both rye cvs. (Russian rye and Rye 8461), while UP 2338 and WH 896 were incompatible with Russian rye only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–445 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highbury was incompatible with both rye cvs. (Russian rye and Rye 8461).

Material
Highburye0
Outcome
incompatible with both rye cvs. (Russian rye and Rye 8461)e0
Qualifier
17-19 days after pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 17-19 days after pollination, the frequency of embryo development showed that wheat cvs. Hope and Highbury were incompatible with both rye cvs. (Russian rye and Rye 8461), while UP 2338 and WH 896 were incompatible with Russian rye only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–445 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UP 2338 was incompatible with Russian rye.

Material
UP 2338e0
Outcome
incompatible with Russian ryee0
Qualifier
17-19 days after pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 17-19 days after pollination, the frequency of embryo development showed that wheat cvs. Hope and Highbury were incompatible with both rye cvs. (Russian rye and Rye 8461), while UP 2338 and WH 896 were incompatible with Russian rye only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–445 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WH 896 was incompatible with Russian rye.

Material
WH 896e0
Outcome
incompatible with Russian ryee0
Qualifier
17-19 days after pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 17-19 days after pollination, the frequency of embryo development showed that wheat cvs. Hope and Highbury were incompatible with both rye cvs. (Russian rye and Rye 8461), while UP 2338 and WH 896 were incompatible with Russian rye only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–445 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese Spring crossed with Russian rye had the highest compatibility.

Material
Chinese Spring (CS)e0
Outcome
compatibilitye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Russian ryee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The compatibility was the highest in the cross of Chinese Spring (CS) with Russian rye.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Standardization of Regeneration Protocol in Wheat-Rye Crosses from Immature Embryos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CS crosses with Russian rye had maximum embryo survival of 85.0% on modified Norstog medium.

Material
CSe0
Treatment
Taira and Larter’s modified Norstog’s mediume0
Outcome
embryo survivale0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
85.0 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum embryo survival (85.0 %) was observed in CS and CS/Hope 5B crosses with Russian rye, when cultured on Taira and Larter’s modified Norstog’s medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Standardization of Regeneration Protocol in Wheat-Rye Crosses from Immature Embryos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CS/Hope 5B crosses with Russian rye had maximum embryo survival of 85.0% on modified Norstog medium.

Material
CS/Hope 5Be0
Treatment
Taira and Larter’s modified Norstog’s mediume0
Outcome
embryo survivale0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
85.0 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum embryo survival (85.0 %) was observed in CS and CS/Hope 5B crosses with Russian rye, when cultured on Taira and Larter’s modified Norstog’s medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Standardization of Regeneration Protocol in Wheat-Rye Crosses from Immature Embryos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Modified Norstog medium was best for wheat-rye regeneration studies.

Treatment
Taira and Larter’s modified Norstog’s mediume0
Outcome
best for plant regeneration studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hence, it was found that Taira and Larter’s modified Norstog’s medium was the best for plant regeneration studies in wheat-rye crosses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1105 · show in text ↑

in vitro · survival · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.