Paper · 2021 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Effects of different tillage systems on soil properties, and yield and yield components of barley

Aminollah Mousavi-Boogar; Khosro Azizi; Mohammad Feizian; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was carried out to assess the influence of tillage systems on soil characteristics as well as barely yield. The two-year experiment with the tillage systems (NT, no-tillage; MT, minimum-tillage; and CT, conventional-tillage) and barley cultivars was done. Vetch was pre-planting in the rotation with barley. About 30% of vetch residue remained in the NT and MT systems, but in CT, these residues were buried by moldboard. Results showed that NT was superior to MT and CT in terms of the soil properties, earthworm number and earthworm body mass. Remains of vetch, as a pre-planted crop, were effective in increasing these indicators. Also, the improvement of these indicators made the no-tillage superior to the MT and CT in terms of geometric mean diameter, mean weight diameter and soil moisture content. In contrast, soil porosity was higher in CT system. In conclusion, soil structure improved during the two years of the experiment when MT or NT was used, while CT was not effective in improving the soil structure. Grain yield (5973 kg ha−1) and NFS (5163) were higher in NT than MT and CT, suggesting that the change in soil structure has provided a better environment for the yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage was superior to minimum and conventional tillage for soil properties, earthworm number and body mass.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
soil properties, earthworm number and earthworm body masse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
MT and CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NT was superior to MT and CT in terms of the soil properties, earthworm number and earthworm body mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch residues increased these soil and earthworm indicators.

Treatment
Remains of vetche0
Outcome
these indicatorse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Remains of vetch, as a pre-planted crop, were effective in increasing these indicators.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage exceeded minimum and conventional tillage for geometric mean diameter, mean weight diameter and soil moisture.

Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
geometric mean diameter, mean weight diameter and soil moisture contente0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
MT and CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no-tillage superior to the MT and CT in terms of geometric mean diameter, mean weight diameter and soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil porosity was higher under conventional tillage.

Treatment
CT systeme0
Outcome
soil porositye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil porosity was higher in CT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage improved soil structure over two years.

Treatment
MTe0
Outcome
soil structuree0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
two years of the experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil structure improved during the two years of the experiment when MT or NT was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage improved soil structure over two years.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
soil structuree0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
two years of the experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil structure improved during the two years of the experiment when MT or NT was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage did not improve soil structure.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
soil structuree0
Direction
not effective in improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT was not effective in improving the soil structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage produced higher barley grain yield of 5973 kg ha−1 than minimum and conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5973 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
MT and CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield (5973 kg ha−1) and NFS (5163) were higher in NT than MT and CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage produced higher NFS of 5163 than minimum and conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
NFSe0
Direction
highere0
Value
5163e0
Comparator
MT and CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield (5973 kg ha−1) and NFS (5163) were higher in NT than MT and CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: physics · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 105 positive, 56 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

tillage · soil: biology · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tillage · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.