Paper · 2021 · Plant Disease

First Report of Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1 on Roots of Wheat in Kazakhstan

Göksel Özer; Mustafa İmren; Tuğba Bozoğlu; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In June 2019, approximately 20 tillers of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were sampled at the ripening stage (Feekes scale 11) from four different fields in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Brown lesions (3-5 mm in length) were present on the roots of sampled plants, with 20% incidence. To determine the causal agent, diseased roots were surface disinfected in sodium hypochlorite solution (1%) for 3 min, rinsed triple with sterile distilled water, air-dried in a laminar flow hood, and plated onto one-fifth strength potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with 50 ppm chloramphenicol. After three days, the hyphal fragments that developed from the sections were transferred to fresh PDA and incubated at 23°C with 12-h photoperiod for 7 days to obtain pure cultures. Brown pigmented fungal colonies with a constriction at the base of hyphal branches, septa near the branching point, and right-angled branching resembling Rhizoctonia solani were observed. The identification anastomosis group (AG) of a representative isolate for each field was conducted by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA with the universal primers ITS4 and ITS5 (White et al. 1990). The resulting sequences of 693 bp length were deposited in GenBank (accession nos. MW898143:MW898146). These sequences were 100% identical to the isolate 8Rs of R. solani AG2-1 (accession no. AF354063). To confirm the pathogenicity of the four isolates, the colonized wheat kernels method described by Demirci (1998) was used to inoculate a sterile potting mix containing peat, vermiculite, and soil (1:1:1 by v/v/v) into which wheat (cv. Seri) was planted. Control pots were inoculated with sterile wheat kernels using the same procedure. Wheat plants were left to grow for four weeks under controlled environmental conditions with a 23°C temperature regime. During the period that the plants remained in the glasshouse, the typical light regime was 16 h. Brown lesions were observed on the roots of plants in the inoculated pots whereas no symptoms were observed on plants grown in the control pots. R. solani was consistently reisolated from symptomatic plants, thereby confirming Koch's postulates. To our knowledge, this is the first report of R. solani AG2-1 on roots of wheat in Kazakhstan. R. solani AG2-1 isolates have been previously reported to be a weak pathogen to wheat (Roberts and Sivasithamparam 1986; Sturrock et al. 2015; Jaaffar et al. 2016; Özer et al. 2019). We suggest further studies are required to characterize the impact of R. solani AG2-1 in wheat. Considering crop rotation, the selection of non-host crops to this AG group is important to pathogen management, by reducing the amount of inoculum in the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown root lesions occurred in sampled wheat with 20% incidence.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
Brown lesionse0
Value
20%e0
Setting
Kazakhstant0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brown lesions (3-5 mm in length) were present on the roots of sampled plants, with 20% incidence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1 on Roots of Wheat in Kazakhstan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal sequences were 100% identical to a Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1 isolate.

Interactor
R. solani AG2-1Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
sequences were 100% identicale0
Value
100%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These sequences were 100% identical to the isolate 8Rs of R. solani AG2-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated wheat roots developed brown lesions while control roots had no symptoms.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
inoculated potse0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1Rhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
Brown lesionse0
Direction
observede0
Comparator
control potse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brown lesions were observed on the roots of plants in the inoculated pots whereas no symptoms were observed on plants grown in the control pots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1 on Roots of Wheat in Kazakhstan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani was consistently reisolated from symptomatic wheat.

Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
R. solani was consistently reisolatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. solani was consistently reisolated from symptomatic plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report R. solani AG2-1 on wheat roots in Kazakhstan for the first time.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Interactor
R. solani AG2-1Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
first report of R. solani AG2-1 on roots of wheat in Kazakhstane0
Setting
Kazakhstane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this is the first report of R. solani AG2-1 on roots of wheat in Kazakhstan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2192–2267 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend further studies of the impact of R. solani AG2-1 in wheat.

Interactor
R. solani AG2-1Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
further studies are required to characterize the impact of R. solani AG2-1 in wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We suggest further studies are required to characterize the impact of R. solani AG2-1 in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2452–2547 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend non-host crops in rotation to reduce R. solani AG2-1 inoculum.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1Rhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
selection of non-host crops to this AG groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the selection of non-host crops to this AG group is important to pathogen management, by reducing the amount of inoculum in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2575–2707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1 on Roots of Wheat in Kazakhstan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–72 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizoctonia solani · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.