Paper · 2012 · Journal of Microbiology Research

Effectiveness of Rhizosphere Bacteria for Control of Root Rot Disease and Improving Plant Growth of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L)

Seema Dua; S. S. Sindhu

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani causes root rot disease in wheat leading to collapsing of the aerial part of the plant. To characterize antagonistic bacteria, one hundred and thirty bacterial isolates were obtained from the rhizosphere soil of wheat and these rhizobacterial isolates alongwith 72 reference strains were screened for their antagonistic interactions against R. solani under cultural conditions. Sixteen bacterial isolates inhibited the growth of R. solani and growth inhibition zone varied from 6- by different rhizobacterial isolates. Two isolates WPS3 and WPS90 caused maximum growth inhibition of the fungi. Growth inhibiton of the pathogenic fungi was also observed using culture filterates of antagonistic rhizobacterial isolates. The protein estimation of the culture filterates showed that the amount of protein excreted by different rhizobacterial isolates varied from 3.6 to 33.0 mg ml-1 of the supernatant. The loss of antagonistic activity after treatment with proteinase K and high temperature treatment indicated that excreted proteins are responsible for the antagonism. Pot house studies showed that inoculation of R. solani in wheat caused 85-90% root rot disease incidence at 60 to 90 days of plant growth. The single inoculation of rhizobacterial isolate WPS3 resulted in 131% increase of plant dry weight as compared to uninoculated control plants. The coinoculation of isolate WPS3 with R. solani enhanced 115% plant dry weight whereas coinoculation of Pseudomonas isolate WPS90 caused 98% increase in plant dry weight in comparison to control uninoculated plants at 90 days of plant growth. Coinoculation of Pseudomonas isolates WPS3 and WPS90 with R. solani also caused 88.9 and 66.7% disease control, respectively at 90 days of plant growth. Thus, Pseudomonas isolate WPS3 could be further exploited for plant growth improvement under field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sixteen isolates inhibited R. solani growth.

Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
growth of R. solanie0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
Sixteene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sixteen bacterial isolates inhibited the growth of R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPS3 and WPS90 produced maximum fungal growth inhibition.

Outcome
growth inhibition of the fungie0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two isolates WPS3 and WPS90 caused maximum growth inhibition of the fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonistic isolate filtrates inhibited pathogenic fungal growth.

Treatment
culture filterates of antagonistic rhizobacterial isolatese0
Outcome
Growth inhibiton of the pathogenic fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth inhibiton of the pathogenic fungi was also observed using culture filterates of antagonistic rhizobacterial isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excreted protein amounts varied from 3.6 to 33.0 mg ml-1.

Outcome
amount of protein excreted by different rhizobacterial isolatese0
Value
3.6 to 33.0 mg ml-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of protein excreted by different rhizobacterial isolates varied from 3.6 to 33.0 mg ml-1 of the supernatant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteinase K and heat eliminated antagonistic activity, implicating excreted proteins.

Treatment
proteinase K and high temperature treatmente0
Outcome
loss of antagonistic activitye0
Qualifier
excreted proteins are responsible for the antagonisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The loss of antagonistic activity after treatment with proteinase K and high temperature treatment indicated that excreted proteins are responsible for the antagonism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani inoculation produced 85-90% wheat root rot incidence.

Treatment
inoculation of R. solanie0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
root rot disease incidencee0
Value
85-90%e0
Qualifier
60 to 90 days of plant growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of R. solani in wheat caused 85-90% root rot disease incidence at 60 to 90 days of plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPS3 alone increased wheat dry weight by 131%.

Treatment
single inoculation of rhizobacterial isolate WPS3e0
Interactor
rhizobacterial isolate WPS3e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
131%e0
Comparator
uninoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The single inoculation of rhizobacterial isolate WPS3 resulted in 131% increase of plant dry weight as compared to uninoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPS3 plus R. solani increased dry weight by 115%.

Treatment
coinoculation of isolate WPS3 with R. solanie0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
isolate WPS3e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
115%e0
Comparator
control uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The coinoculation of isolate WPS3 with R. solani enhanced 115% plant dry weight whereas coinoculation of Pseudomonas isolate WPS90 caused 98% increase in plant dry weight in comparison to control uninoculated plants at 90 days of plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPS90 plus R. solani increased dry weight by 98%.

Treatment
coinoculation of Pseudomonas isolate WPS90e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas isolate WPS90e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
98%e0
Comparator
control uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coinoculation of Pseudomonas isolate WPS90 caused 98% increase in plant dry weight in comparison to control uninoculated plants at 90 days of plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPS3 with R. solani controlled disease by 88.9%.

Treatment
Coinoculation of Pseudomonas isolates WPS3e0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
WPS3e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease controle0
Value
88.9e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation of Pseudomonas isolates WPS3 and WPS90 with R. solani also caused 88.9 and 66.7% disease control, respectively at 90 days of plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPS90 with R. solani controlled disease by 66.7%.

Treatment
Coinoculation of Pseudomonas isolates WPS3 and WPS90 with R. solanie0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
WPS90e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease controle0
Value
66.7%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation of Pseudomonas isolates WPS3 and WPS90 with R. solani also caused 88.9 and 66.7% disease control, respectively at 90 days of plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

WPS3 merits further field evaluation for growth improvement.

Interactor
Pseudomonas isolate WPS3e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growth improvement under field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas isolate WPS3 could be further exploited for plant growth improvement under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑

Rhizoctonia solani · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Rhizoctonia solani · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Pseudomonas · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · Rhizoctonia solani · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

164 papers: 104 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.