Paper · 2021 · Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center

Identity and prevalence of wheat damping-off fungal pathogens in different fields of Basrah and Maysan provinces

Mohammed Hamza Abass; Qusai Hattab Madhi; Abdulnabi Abdul Ameer Matrood

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Wheat is the most consumed cereal crops in the world infected by several pathogens and pests causing significant losses. The most threatening pathogens are fungi which cause serious diseases on roots, leaves and heads as one of the most threatening pathogens in specific wheat-growing countries. This study aimed to identify and evaluate the prevalence of damping-off fungal pathogens in different wheat fields at Basra and Maysan provinces. Results Disease incidence determination and fungal isolation were carried out from two sites at Basra province (Al-Qurna and Al-Madinah) and three sites at Maysan province (Al-Amarah, Kumit, Ali Al Sharqi and Ali Al Gharbi). Al-Qurna fields had the highest disease incidence (32%), while Ali-Alsharqi fields had the lowest one (11%). Fourteen fungal genera were identified. Rhizoctonia solani had the highest appearance (21.6) and frequency (20.20%) percentages followed by Fusarium solani (16.11,14.01) percentages and Macrophomina phaseolina (12.2,11.1) percentages. Seed treatment with R. solani (Rs1 isolate) showed significant decrease in germination (56.6%) compared to F. solani and M. phaseolina treatments. Seed treatment with R. solani (Rs1 isolate) showed significant decrease in germination (56.6%) compared to F. solani and M. phaseolina treatments. Conclusions These results revealed the prevalence of wheat damping-off disease in all examined fields at both Basra and Maysan province; the highest disease incidence was seen in Basra wheat fields (Al-Qurna fields); the identification of fungal pathogens showed that the most isolated fungus was R. solani followed by F. solani and M. phaseolina . Laboratory experiments showed the pathogenicity of isolated fungi which varied according to the isolate type.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al-Qurna had the highest wheat damping-off incidence, 32%.

Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
32%e0
Setting
Al-Qurna fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Al-Qurna fields had the highest disease incidence (32%), while Ali-Alsharqi fields had the lowest one (11%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ali-Alsharqi had the lowest wheat damping-off incidence, 11%.

Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
11%e0
Setting
Ali-Alsharqi fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Al-Qurna fields had the highest disease incidence (32%), while Ali-Alsharqi fields had the lowest one (11%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen fungal genera were identified in wheat fields.

Outcome
Fourteen fungal generae0
Value
Fourteene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fourteen fungal genera were identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia solani had the highest appearance percentage, 21.6.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
appearancee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizoctonia solani had the highest appearance (21.6) and frequency (20.20%) percentages followed by Fusarium solani (16.11,14.01) percentages and Macrophomina phaseolina (12.2,11.1) percentages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia solani had the highest frequency percentage, 20.20%.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
frequencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
20.20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizoctonia solani had the highest appearance (21.6) and frequency (20.20%) percentages followed by Fusarium solani (16.11,14.01) percentages and Macrophomina phaseolina (12.2,11.1) percentages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium solani followed Rhizoctonia in appearance at 16.11%.

Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium solanie0
Value
16.11e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium solani (16.11,14.01) percentages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium solani frequency was 14.01%.

Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium solanie0
Value
14.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium solani (16.11,14.01) percentages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrophomina phaseolina appearance was 12.2%.

Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
Macrophomina phaseolinae0
Value
12.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Macrophomina phaseolina (12.2,11.1) percentages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrophomina phaseolina frequency was 11.1%.

Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
Macrophomina phaseolinae0
Value
11.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Macrophomina phaseolina (12.2,11.1) percentages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani Rs1 seed treatment significantly decreased wheat germination to 56.6% compared with other fungal treatments.

Treatment
Seed treatment with R. solani (Rs1 isolate)e0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
56.6%e0
Comparator
F. solani and M. phaseolina treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with R. solani (Rs1 isolate) showed significant decrease in germination (56.6%) compared to F. solani and M. phaseolina treatments. Conclusions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑

Rhizoctonia solani · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 259 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.