Paper · 2016 · PLoS ONE

The Multifarious PGPR Serratia marcescens CDP-13 Augments Induced Systemic Resistance and Enhanced Salinity Tolerance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Rajnish Prakash Singh; Prabhat Nath Jha

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
303
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study demonstrates the plant growth promoting (PGP) potential of a bacterial isolate CDP-13 isolated from 'Capparis decidua' plant, and its ability to protect plants from the deleterious effect of biotic and abiotic stressors. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the isolate was identified as Serratia marcescens. Among the PGP traits, the isolate was found to be positive for ACC deaminase activity, phosphate solubilization, production of siderophore, indole acetic acid production, nitrogen fixation, and ammonia production. CDP-13 showed growth at an increased salt (NaCl) concentration of up to 6%, indicating its potential to survive and associate with plants growing in saline soil. The inoculation of S. marcescens enhanced the growth of wheat plant under salinity stress (150-200 mM). It significantly reduced inhibition of plant growth (15 to 85%) caused by salt stressors. Application of CDP-13 also modulated concentration (20 to 75%) of different osmoprotectants (proline, malondialdehyde, total soluble sugar, total protein content, and indole acetic acid) in plants suggesting its role in enabling plants to tolerate salt stressors. In addition, bacterial inoculation also reduced the disease severity caused by fungal infection, which illustrated its ability to confer induced systemic resistance (ISR) in host plants. Treatment of wheat plants with the test organism caused alteration in anti-oxidative enzymes activities (Superoxide dismutase, Catalase, and Peroxidase) under various salinity levels, and therefore minimizes the salinity-induced oxidative damages to the plants. Colonization efficiency of strain CDP-13 was confirmed by CFU count, epi-fluorescence microscopy, and ERIC-PCR-based DNA fingerprinting approach. Hence, the study indicates that bacterium CDP-13 enhances plant growth, and has potential for the amelioration of salinity stress in wheat plants. Likewise, the results also provide insights into biotechnological approaches to using PGPR as an alternative to chemicals and pesticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia marcescens inoculation enhanced wheat growth under salinity stress.

Treatment
inoculation of S. marcescense0
Interactor
S. marcescensSerratia marcescense0symbiont
Outcome
growth of wheat plante0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
salinity stress (150-200 mM)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia marcescens
Serratia marcescens · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inoculation of S. marcescens enhanced the growth of wheat plant under salinity stress (150-200 mM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CDP-13 significantly reduced salt-induced inhibition of plant growth by 15 to 85%.

Outcome
inhibition of plant growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15 to 85%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“It significantly reduced inhibition of plant growth (15 to 85%) caused by salt stressors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CDP-13 application modulated osmoprotectant concentrations in plants by 20 to 75%.

Treatment
Application of CDP-13e0
Outcome
concentratione0
Value
20 to 75%e0
Qualifier
different osmoprotectants (proline, malondialdehyde, total soluble sugar, total protein content, and indole acetic acid)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of CDP-13 also modulated concentration (20 to 75%) of different osmoprotectants (proline, malondialdehyde, total soluble sugar, total protein content, and indole acetic acid) in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation reduced fungal disease severity in host plants.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Interactor
fungale0pathogen
Outcome
disease severity caused by fungal infectione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“bacterial inoculation also reduced the disease severity caused by fungal infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with the bacterium altered antioxidant enzyme activities under salinity.

Treatment
Treatment of wheat plants with the test organisme0
Outcome
anti-oxidative enzymes activitiese0
Qualifier
under various salinity levelse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment of wheat plants with the test organism caused alteration in anti-oxidative enzymes activities (Superoxide dismutase, Catalase, and Peroxidase) under various salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colonization by CDP-13 was confirmed using three assays.

Interactor
strain CDP-13e0symbiont
Outcome
Colonization efficiency of strain CDP-13e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–149 · show in text ↑
e0

“Colonization efficiency of strain CDP-13 was confirmed by CFU count, epi-fluorescence microscopy, and ERIC-PCR-based DNA fingerprinting approach.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1760 · show in text ↑

Serratia marcescens · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

164 papers: 104 positive, 60 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.