Paper · 2021 · AgriEngineering

Comparative Experimental Effects of Intercropping and Cypermethrin on Insect Pest Infestation and Yield of Maize, Cowpea and Okra in Two Cameroonian Agro-Ecological Zones

Patient Farsia Djidjonri; Nukenine Elias Nchiwan; Hartmut Koehler

14
claims
19
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study investigates the effect of intercropping (maize-cowpea, maize-okra, maize-okra-cowpea, okra-cowpea) compared to insecticide application on the level of infestation of insect pests and the final yield of maize, cowpea and okra. Field experiments were conducted during the 2016 and 2017 cropping seasons in the Guinean Savannah (Dang-Ngaoundere) and Sudano Sahelian (Gouna-Garoua) agro-ecological zones in Cameroon. Our experimental design was a split plot arrangement in a randomized complete block with four replications. The main factor was assigned to the use of insecticide (Cypermethrin) and sub plots were devoted for cropping systems. We compared the efficiency of intercropping to that of Cypermethrin application on the Yield of maize, cowpea and okra as influenced by insect pest damages. The comparison of monocropped sprayed by Cypermethrin to unsprayed showed that, in Dang, insect pests reduced maize yield by 37% and 24% in 2016 and 2017, respectively, whereas in Gouna, it was lower than 8% during the both years. Reduction in seed yield by insect pests on cowpea in Dang represented 47% and 50% in 2016 and 2017, respectively, whereas in Gouna, it was 55% and 63% in 2016 and 2017, respectively. For okra, insect pests reduced okra fruit yield by 25% and 44% in Dang and 23% and 28% in Gouna, respectively, in 2016 and 2017. Crop yield was lower in intercropping compared to monoculture due to competition of plants in association on different resources. Considering the total yields obtained from each intercropping, intercropping trials resulted generally in higher yields compared to mono-culture (LER > 1) in both sites and years but the respective yields were quite different. On the basis of the results obtained, we recommend maize-cowpea intercropping as a sustainable solution to reduce the infestation level of their pest insects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pests reduced Dang maize yield by 37% in 2016.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
37%e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Setting
Dange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Dang, insect pests reduced maize yield by 37% and 24% in 2016 and 2017, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pests reduced Dang maize yield by 24% in 2017.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24%e0
Qualifier
2017e0
Setting
Dange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Dang, insect pests reduced maize yield by 37% and 24% in 2016 and 2017, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield loss to pests was below 8% in Gouna in both years.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
insect pestse1pest
Outcome
maize yielde1
Direction
lowere0
Value
8%e0
Setting
Gounae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas in Gouna, it was lower than 8% during the both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pests reduced maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pests reduced Dang cowpea seed yield by 47% in 2016.

Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
47%e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Setting
Dange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in seed yield by insect pests on cowpea in Dang represented 47% and 50% in 2016 and 2017, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1159 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pests reduced Dang cowpea seed yield by 50% in 2017.

Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
2017e0
Setting
Dange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in seed yield by insect pests on cowpea in Dang represented 47% and 50% in 2016 and 2017, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1159 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pests reduced Gouna cowpea seed yield by 55% in 2016.

Interactor
insect pestse1pest
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
Reductione1
Value
55%e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Setting
Gounae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas in Gouna, it was 55% and 63% in 2016 and 2017, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reduction in seed yield by insect pests on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1096 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pests reduced Gouna cowpea seed yield by 63% in 2017.

Interactor
insect pestse1pest
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
Reductione1
Value
63%e0
Qualifier
2017e0
Setting
Gounae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas in Gouna, it was 55% and 63% in 2016 and 2017, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reduction in seed yield by insect pests on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1096 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pests reduced Dang okra fruit yield by 25% in 2016.

Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
okra fruit yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Setting
Dange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For okra, insect pests reduced okra fruit yield by 25% and 44% in Dang and 23% and 28% in Gouna, respectively, in 2016 and 2017.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pests reduced Dang okra fruit yield by 44% in 2017.

Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
okra fruit yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
44%e0
Qualifier
2017e0
Setting
Dange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For okra, insect pests reduced okra fruit yield by 25% and 44% in Dang and 23% and 28% in Gouna, respectively, in 2016 and 2017.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pests reduced Gouna okra fruit yield by 23% in 2016.

Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
okra fruit yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23%e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Setting
Gounae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For okra, insect pests reduced okra fruit yield by 25% and 44% in Dang and 23% and 28% in Gouna, respectively, in 2016 and 2017.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pests reduced Gouna okra fruit yield by 28% in 2017.

Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
okra fruit yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
28%e0
Qualifier
2017e0
Setting
Gounae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For okra, insect pests reduced okra fruit yield by 25% and 44% in Dang and 23% and 28% in Gouna, respectively, in 2016 and 2017.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Per-crop yield was lower under intercropping than monoculture because of resource competition.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
Crop yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
competition of plants in association on different resourcese0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop yield was lower in intercropping compared to monoculture due to competition of plants in association on different resources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize, Cowpea and Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total intercrop yield generally exceeded monoculture yield at both sites and in both years, with LER > 1.

Treatment
intercropping trialse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
LER > 1e0
Qualifier
both sites and yearse0
Comparator
mono-culturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping trials resulted generally in higher yields compared to mono-culture (LER > 1) in both sites and years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize, Cowpea and Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–129 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend maize-cowpea intercropping to reduce pest infestation.

Taxon
maize-cowpeae0
Interactor
pest insectse0pest
Outcome
maize-cowpea intercropping as a sustainable solution to reduce the infestation level of their pest insectse0

Verbatim

e0

“we recommend maize-cowpea intercropping as a sustainable solution to reduce the infestation level of their pest insects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1874 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

intercropping · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 25 positive, 21 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.