Paper · 2021 · Izvestiâ Timirâzevskoj selʹskohozâjstvennoj akademii

EFFECT OF TILLAGE METHODS AND LEVELS OF MINERAL NUTRITION ON YIELD AND GRAIN QUALITY OF THE “VLADIMIR” SPRING BARLEY VARIETY IN THE CENTRAL REGION OF THE NON-CHERNOZEM ZONE

Timirâzevskaâ selʹskohozâjstvennaâ akademiâ; А.N. FILATOV; V.N. MAZUROV; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Providing the brewing industry with locally produced raw materials is important both from an economic point of view and in terms of import substitution. Breeders create brewing barley varieties with a reduced protein content, however, in production they often use universal varieties that combine high yields with an average protein content of 11–12%. For such varieties, it is necessary to develop technological methods for obtaining a crop with specified properties, depending on the purposes of using the products. The quality indicators of barley grain and the efficiency of its production are significantly influenced by mineral fertilizers and the minimization of soil cultivation. In this regard, the authors studied the effect of minimal tillage on the yield and grain quality of spring barley of the Vladimir variety at two levels of mineral nutrition (without fertilizers 26 and with full supply oif mineral fertilizer – N35P40K135) in a two-factor field experiment carried out in 2018–2019 on the medium-loamy light gray forest soil. The experiment helped determine the yield and structure of the crop, the content of protein, starch, and grain hoodness (hull content). It was found that the lack of precipitation during the barley tillering – heading period leads to a decrease in grain yield by 40.0–54.8% as compared with the conditions of increased moisturizing. At the same time, there was an increase in the grain protein content by 1.4–1.7% and the grain filminess by 0.5–0.9%. The use of moderate rates of complete mineral fertilizer (N35P40K85) led to an increase in the barley yield by an average of 13.2% and the grain protein content by an average of 0.2%. On the other hand, it led to a decrease in the grain filminess by 0.2% and starch content by 0.4–0.6%. The positive effect of nitrogen fertilizers on the increase in protein content in barley grain was higher under minimal tillage. Under minimal tillage, regardless of the level of moisture supply and mineral nutrition, there was a tendency towards a decrease in the barley yield by an average of 3.9%, mainly due to a decrease in the density of the productive stalk. There was also a tendency towards a decrease in the protein content in the barley grain – by 0.3% – when no complete mineral fertilizer was used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain yield decrease by 40.0–54.8%.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
40.0–54.8%e0
Setting
barley tillering – heading periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lack of precipitation during the barley tillering – heading period leads to a decrease in grain yield by 40.0–54.8% as compared with the conditions of increased moisturizing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1376 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain protein content increase by 1.4–1.7%.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.4–1.7%e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was an increase in the grain protein content by 1.4–1.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer changed barley barley yield.

Treatment
moderate rates of complete mineral fertilizer (N35P40K85)e0
Outcome
barley yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate rates of complete mineral fertilizer (N35P40K85) led to an increase in the barley yield by an average of 13.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer changed barley grain protein content.

Treatment
moderate rates of complete mineral fertilizer (N35P40K85)e0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate rates of complete mineral fertilizer (N35P40K85) led to an increase in the barley yield by an average of 13.2% and the grain protein content by an average of 0.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1678 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain filminess increased by 0.5–0.9%.

Outcome
grain filminesse0
Value
0.5–0.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain filminess by 0.5–0.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer decreased grain filminess by 0.2%.

Outcome
grain filminesse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
0.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in the grain filminess by 0.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer decreased starch content by 0.4–0.6%.

Outcome
starch contente0
Value
0.4–0.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“starch content by 0.4–0.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1781 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased barley grain protein more under minimal tillage.

Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive effect of nitrogen fertilizers on the increase in protein content in barley grain was higher under minimal tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1787–1910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimal tillage tended to decrease barley yield by 3.9%.

Outcome
barley yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
3.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under minimal tillage, regardless of the level of moisture supply and mineral nutrition, there was a tendency towards a decrease in the barley yield by an average of 3.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1912–2082 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content tended to decrease by 0.3% without complete fertilizer.

Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
0.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tendency towards a decrease in the protein content in the barley grain – by 0.3% – when no complete mineral fertilizer was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2166–2293 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 64 positive, 15 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.