Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Agronomy

Ripening Response of Sugarcane Varieties to Chemical Ripeners and Economic Benefits during the Early Period of Harvesting at Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations, Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

Netsanet Ayele; Tamado Tana; Philippus Daniel Riekert Van Heerden; et al.

11
claims
34
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wonji-Shoa and Metahara sugarcane plantations experience reduced sucrose content (%) during the starting period of sugarcane crushing due to the combined influence of high (>27°C) temperature and the presence of high residual soil moisture. Studies elsewhere showed the potential of chemical ripeners in boosting the sucrose content (%), where natural ripening is deterred by these challenges. Accordingly, a field experiment was conducted to evaluate the responsiveness of selected sugarcane varieties to chemical ripeners at both plantations. The treatments consisted of a factorial combination of four sugarcane varieties (B52298, NCo334, C86-56, and SP70-1284) and six ripener treatments: (1) Ethephon™(720 g ai ha−1), (2) Fusilade Forte™(25.6 g ai ha−1), (3) Moddus™ (250 g ai ha−1), (4) Ethephon™ (720 g ai ha−1) + Fusilade Forte™ (25.6 g ai ha−1), (5) Moddus™ (250 g ai ha−1) + Fusilade Forte™ (25.6 g ai ha−1), and (6) Unsprayed (control). The experiment was laid out in a randomised complete block design in a factorial arrangement with three replications. The results showed a significant ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>0.025</a:mn> </a:math> ) and highly significant ( <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>p</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>0.001</c:mn> </c:math> ) variety by ripener interaction in stalk height and sucrose content, respectively, while the main effect ripener highly significantly affected stalk weight ( <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mi>p</e:mi> <e:mo>=</e:mo> <e:mn>0.001</e:mn> </e:math> ) and sucrose yield ( <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <g:mi>p</g:mi> <g:mo>=</g:mo> <g:mn>0.003</g:mn> </g:math> ). The variety C86-56 sprayed with combinations of Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ and Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ had the shortest stalk heights of 1.27 and 1.29 m, respectively, compared with the control. Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination resulted in the highest reduction of stalk weight (8.36%), while the lowest was recorded in the sole Moddus™ treatment (6.31%). From the ripener treatments, the Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination and Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination improved sucrose yield by 1.42 and 1.34 t ha−1, respectively, compared with the control. However, in economic terms, the Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination treatment resulted in the highest marginal rate of return of 1244%. Therefore, the Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination ripener treatment was found to be promising to be evaluated at a commercial scale on immature sugarcane varieties B52-298, NCo334, and SP70-1284.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The variety by ripener interaction was significant for stalk height.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
ripenere1
Outcome
stalk heighte1
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“variety by ripener interaction in stalk height and sucrose content, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1452 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The variety by ripener interaction was significant for sucrose content.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
ripenere1
Outcome
sucrose contente1
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“variety by ripener interaction in stalk height and sucrose content, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1452 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The main effect of ripener was highly significant for stalk weight.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
ripenere2
Outcome
stalk weighte2
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“the main effect ripener highly significantly affected stalk weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1526 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The main effect of ripener was highly significant for sucrose yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
ripenere2
Outcome
sucrose yielde3
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“the main effect ripener highly significantly affected stalk weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1526 · show in text ↑
e3

“and sucrose yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety C86-56 sprayed with the Ethephon + Fusilade Forte and Moddus + Fusilade Forte combinations had the shortest stalk heights, 1.27 and 1.29 m.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
C86-56e4
Treatment
Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ and Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™e4
Outcome
stalk heightse4
Direction
shorteste4
Value
1.27 and 1.29 me4
Comparator
controle4
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e4

“The variety C86-56 sprayed with combinations of Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ and Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ had the shortest stalk heights of 1.27 and 1.29 m, respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ethephon + Fusilade Forte combination gave the highest reduction of stalk weight, 8.36%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ combinatione6
Outcome
reduction of stalk weighte6
Direction
highest reductione6
Value
8.36%e6
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e6

“Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination resulted in the highest reduction of stalk weight (8.36%), while the lowest was recorded in the sole Moddus™ treatment (6.31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1994–2160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sole Moddus treatment gave the lowest reduction of stalk weight, 6.31%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sole Moddus™ treatmente6
Outcome
reduction of stalk weighte6
Direction
loweste6
Value
6.31%e6
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e6

“Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination resulted in the highest reduction of stalk weight (8.36%), while the lowest was recorded in the sole Moddus™ treatment (6.31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1994–2160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Moddus + Fusilade Forte combination improved sucrose yield by 1.42 t ha−1 compared with the control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ combinatione7
Outcome
sucrose yielde7
Direction
improvede7
Value
1.42e7
Comparator
controle7
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e7

“the Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination and Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination improved sucrose yield by 1.42 and 1.34 t ha−1, respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2191–2364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ethephon + Fusilade Forte combination improved sucrose yield by 1.34 t ha−1 compared with the control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ combinatione7
Outcome
sucrose yielde7
Direction
improvede7
Value
1.34 t ha−1e7
Comparator
controle7
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e7

“the Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination and Ethephon™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination improved sucrose yield by 1.42 and 1.34 t ha−1, respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2191–2364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Moddus + Fusilade Forte combination gave the highest marginal rate of return, 1244%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination treatmente7
Outcome
marginal rate of returne7
Direction
higheste7
Value
1244%e7
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e7

“the Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination treatment resulted in the highest marginal rate of return of 1244%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2394–2502 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend evaluating the Moddus + Fusilade Forte ripener treatment at commercial scale on immature sugarcane varieties.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
B52-298, NCo334, and SP70-1284e2
Treatment
Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination ripener treatmente2
Outcome
promising to be evaluated at a commercial scalee2
Setting
Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantationst1

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“the Moddus™ + Fusilade Forte™ combination ripener treatment was found to be promising to be evaluated at a commercial scale on immature sugarcane varieties B52-298, NCo334, and SP70-1284”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2515–2701 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.