Abstract
The study was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station in Shandaweel, Sohag Governorate, Egypt. (latitude of 26.33° N and longitude of 31.41° E) in the 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 planting seasons, to evaluate the effects of three concentrations of the chemical ripener " Ethrel" (0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 liter/fed) sprayed on the leaves, in addition to control treatment (without spraying) on yield and quality of tow sugarcane varieties [the commercial variety (G.T. 54-9) and the promising one (G. 2004-27) in addition to (G. 2005-47) genotype]. A randomized complete block design was used in a split-plot arrangement was used. The results showed that the sugarcane varieties differed markedly in all studied traits. G.T. 54-9 variety superior in stalk diameter and sugar yield/fed in both seasons as well as cane yield/fed in the 1st one, while, G.2004-27 variety recorded the highest stalk and most number of millable canes/fed in both seasons as well as cane yield/fed in the 1st season, on the other hand, G.2005-47 genotype was superior in brix, sucrose, purity and sugar recovery% in both seasons. The results also showed that adding 1.0 liter/fed of Ethrel spray to the cane leaves caused an increase in brix, sucrose, purity and sugar recovery% as well as sugar yield/fed, compared to the untreated (control). On the contrary, the treatments with Ethrel concentrations led to a decrease in the height and diameter of the stalk as well as cane yield. However, the increase (%) in quality and sugar yield was more than the decrease in cane yield. Therefore, Ethrel addition led to an increase in quality and sugar yield at concentration of 1.0 liter/fed "E3". Under conditions of this work, it was found that growing all studied sugarcane varieties and spraying them with 1.0 l/fed of Ethrel ripener can be recommended for the maximum sugar production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane varieties differed in all studied traits.
Verbatim
e0“the sugarcane varieties differed markedly in all studied traits”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
G.T. 54-9 had superior stalk diameter and sugar yield in both seasons.
Verbatim
e0“G.T. 54-9 variety superior in stalk diameter and sugar yield/fed in both seasons”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
G.T. 54-9 had superior cane yield in the first season.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“as well as cane yield/fed in the 1st one”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
e1“G.T. 54-9 variety superior in stalk diameter and sugar yield/fed in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
G.2004-27 had the highest stalk and millable cane number in both seasons.
Verbatim
e0“G.2004-27 variety recorded the highest stalk and most number of millable canes/fed in both seasons”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
G.2004-27 had higher first-season cane yield.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“as well as cane yield/fed in the 1st season”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
e1“G.2004-27 variety recorded the highest stalk and most number of millable canes/fed in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
G.2005-47 was superior in brix, sucrose and purity across seasons.
Verbatim
e0“G.2005-47 genotype was superior in brix, sucrose, purity and sugar recovery% in both seasons”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
G.2005-47 was superior in sugar recovery across seasons.
Verbatim
e0“G.2005-47 genotype was superior in brix, sucrose, purity and sugar recovery% in both seasons”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel at 1.0 liter/fed raised brix, sucrose and purity versus control.
Verbatim
e0“adding 1.0 liter/fed of Ethrel spray to the cane leaves caused an increase in brix, sucrose, purity and sugar recovery% as well as sugar yield/fed, compared to the untreated (control)”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel at 1.0 liter/fed raised sugar recovery versus control.
Verbatim
e0“adding 1.0 liter/fed of Ethrel spray to the cane leaves caused an increase in brix, sucrose, purity and sugar recovery% as well as sugar yield/fed, compared to the untreated (control)”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel at 1.0 liter/fed raised sugar yield versus control.
Verbatim
e0“adding 1.0 liter/fed of Ethrel spray to the cane leaves caused an increase in brix, sucrose, purity and sugar recovery% as well as sugar yield/fed, compared to the untreated (control)”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel treatments lowered stalk height and diameter.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Ethrel concentrationse0
- Outcome
- height and diameter of the stalke0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the treatments with Ethrel concentrations led to a decrease in the height and diameter of the stalk as well as cane yield”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel treatments lowered cane yield.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the treatments with Ethrel concentrations led to a decrease in the height and diameter of the stalk as well as cane yield”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Quality and sugar yield gains exceeded cane yield losses.
Verbatim
e0“the increase (%) in quality and sugar yield was more than the decrease in cane yield”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend all studied varieties with Ethrel 1.0 l/fed for maximum sugar production.
Verbatim
e0“growing all studied sugarcane varieties and spraying them with 1.0 l/fed of Ethrel ripener can be recommended for the maximum sugar production”
t0“Responses of Some Sugarcane Varieties to Application of Ethrel Ripener with Respect to Their on Quality and Productivity”
The same questions in other papers
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →application · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
24 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.