Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Correlation Among Phenotypic Parameters Related to the Growth and Photosynthesis of Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) Grown Under Various Light Intensity Conditions

Hyo Gil Choi

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate characteristics of phenotypic parameters such as physiology, yield, and fruit quality responses of strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) to various light intensity conditions (VLICs), and to determine the correlations among these phenotypic parameters. Strawberry plants were cultivated in a smart greenhouse separated into four areas, three of which were completely shaded by curtains from 20:00 until 10:00 (3 hS), 12:00 (5 hS), and 14:00 (7 hS), respectively. The fourth area was a non-shaded control treatment (0 hS). The ambient light intensities during the experimental period for the 0, 3, 5, and 7 hS treatments were 1,285, 1,139, 770, and 364 mol⋅m –2 , respectively. Strawberry plants grown under low light intensity conditions experienced decreases in photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and sugar accumulation compared to the 0 hS. Petiole generation and fruit yield were also sharply decreased in proportion to the degree of decrease in light intensity. In contrast, photosynthetic pigment content was shown to increase under low light conditions. Organic acid contents (excluding acetic acid) and leaflet size did not change significantly under low light conditions compared to the 0 hS. Changes to light intensity are considered to induce changes to the phenotypic characteristics of strawberry plants to favor growth using the energy and carbon skeletons obtained through respiration and photosynthesis. In the 7 hS treatment, where light intensity was drastically reduced, NPQ, qP, and R Fd values as chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters were significantly lowered, which could indicate their measurement as an important technique to check the stress response of plants grown in low light conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry plants under low light intensity had decreased photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and sugar accumulation compared with the 0 hS control.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
low light intensity conditionse1
Outcome
photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and sugar accumulatione1
Direction
decreasese1
Comparator
0 hSe1
Setting
smart greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberry plants were cultivated in a smart greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Strawberry plants grown under low light intensity conditions experienced decreases in photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and sugar accumulation compared to the 0 hS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole generation and fruit yield were sharply decreased in proportion to the decrease in light intensity.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
decrease in light intensitye2
Outcome
Petiole generation and fruit yielde2
Direction
sharply decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberry plants were cultivated in a smart greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–357 · show in text ↑
e2

“Petiole generation and fruit yield were also sharply decreased in proportion to the degree of decrease in light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic pigment content increased under low light conditions.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
low light conditionse3
Outcome
photosynthetic pigment contente3
Direction
increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberry plants were cultivated in a smart greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–357 · show in text ↑
e3

“photosynthetic pigment content was shown to increase under low light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic acid contents and leaflet size did not change significantly under low light conditions compared with the 0 hS control.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
low light conditionse4
Outcome
Organic acid contents (excluding acetic acid) and leaflet sizee4
Direction
did not change significantlye4
Comparator
0 hSe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberry plants were cultivated in a smart greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–357 · show in text ↑
e4

“Organic acid contents (excluding acetic acid) and leaflet size did not change significantly under low light conditions compared to the 0 hS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPQ, qP and R Fd chlorophyll a fluorescence values were significantly lowered in the 7 hS low-light treatment.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
7 hSe5
Outcome
NPQ, qP, and R Fd valuese5
Direction
significantly lowerede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberry plants were cultivated in a smart greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–357 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the 7 hS treatment, where light intensity was drastically reduced, NPQ, qP, and R Fd values as chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters were significantly lowered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1638 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Measuring chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters may be an important technique to check the stress response of strawberry plants grown in low light.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
stress responsee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberry plants were cultivated in a smart greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–357 · show in text ↑
e6

“could indicate their measurement as an important technique to check the stress response of plants grown in low light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1773 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

61 papers: 46 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

light · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 54 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.