Paper · 2011 · Biological Sciences - PJSIR

Sulphur Supply Enhances Wheat Growth and Yield on Saline-Sodic Soil

Muhammad Arshadullah; Syed Ishtiaq Hyder; Arshad Ali

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

. The effect of different S levels (0, 25, 50 and 75 kg S/ha) on growth and ionic concentration of wheat variety Inqlab-91 directly sown on saline-sodic soil (ECe=5.65 dS/m, pH=8.57 and SAR=17.38) was evaluated in a field experiment. Treatments were arranged using randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The crop was harvested at maturity, data on tillering, plant height, spike length, number of grains/spike, 1000- grain weight and yields (grain and straw) were recorded. Na, K, Ca and S concentrations in grain and straw were estimated using atomic absorption spectroscopy. Tillering, number of grains/spike, 1000- grain weight and grain yield significantly (p :: 0.05) increased by enhancing the S application. Maximum wheat yield (4.66 t/ha) was recorded when S was applied at 75 kg/ha, which was 43% more than the control treatment. Maximum number of tillers/plant (161) and number of grains/spike (56) were recorded with sulphur applied at 75 kg/ha. Positive correlation (r = 0.85), (r = 0.88) between calcium, potassium and negative correlation (r = -0.84) between grain sodium content and wheat grain yield was recorded. It indicates that presence of significantly higher Ca and K contents of grain receiving S application might possibly help plants to attain more Ca and K and avoided sodium uptake to alleviate salinity/sodicity stress. Economical analysis showed that maximum value cost ratio (5.5:1) was achieved with the application of 25 kg S/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillering, grains per spike, thousand-grain weight and grain yield increased significantly with sulphur application.

Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
Tillering, number of grains/spike, 1000- grain weight and grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillering, number of grains/spike, 1000- grain weight and grain yield significantly (p :: 0.05) increased by enhancing the S application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield reached 4.66 t/ha with 75 kg/ha sulphur, 43% above control.

Treatment
S was applied at 75 kg/hae0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
4.66 t/hae0
Qualifier
43% moree0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum wheat yield (4.66 t/ha) was recorded when S was applied at 75 kg/ha, which was 43% more than the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillers per plant reached 161 with 75 kg/ha sulphur.

Treatment
sulphur applied at 75 kg/hae0
Outcome
number of tillers/plante0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
161e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of tillers/plant (161) and number of grains/spike (56) were recorded with sulphur applied at 75 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per spike reached 56 with 75 kg/ha sulphur.

Treatment
sulphur applied at 75 kg/hae0
Outcome
number of grains/spikee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
56e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of tillers/plant (161) and number of grains/spike (56) were recorded with sulphur applied at 75 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain calcium content correlated positively with wheat grain yield (r = 0.85).

Compound
calciume0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
Positivee0
Value
r = 0.85e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive correlation (r = 0.85), (r = 0.88) between calcium, potassium and negative correlation (r = -0.84) between grain sodium content and wheat grain yield was recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1155 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain potassium content correlated positively with wheat grain yield (r = 0.88).

Compound
potassiume0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
Positivee0
Value
r = 0.88e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive correlation (r = 0.85), (r = 0.88) between calcium, potassium and negative correlation (r = -0.84) between grain sodium content and wheat grain yield was recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1155 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain sodium content correlated negatively with wheat grain yield (r = -0.84).

Compound
sodiume0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r = -0.84e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative correlation (r = -0.84) between grain sodium content and wheat grain yield was recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1155 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest greater grain calcium and potassium with sulphur may limit sodium uptake and alleviate salinity stress.

Treatment
S applicatione0
Compound
Ca and Ke0
Outcome
avoided sodium uptakee0
Qualifier
might possiblye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“presence of significantly higher Ca and K contents of grain receiving S application might possibly help plants to attain more Ca and K and avoided sodium uptake to alleviate salinity/sodicity stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum value cost ratio was 5.5:1 at 25 kg S/ha.

Treatment
application of 25 kg S/hae0
Outcome
value cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.5:1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Economical analysis showed that maximum value cost ratio (5.5:1) was achieved with the application of 25 kg S/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.