Paper · 2020 · PLANT ARCHIVES

EVALUATION OF LONG TERM DIFFERENT NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON CROP PRODUCTIVITY AND SOIL QUALITY IN RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA) CROPPING SYSTEM IN NEW ALLUVIAL SOIL ZONE OF WEST BENGAL, INDIA

P. Bose; M. Roy; P.K Patra; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We analyzed data from a long-term rice-potato-groundnut cropping sequence to evaluate the effects of different nutrient management practices on yield trends, economics and soil fertility of the system. In this study, most of the organic and integrated treatments showed significantly higher mean system yield in terms of rice-equivalent yield (REY) of the 13th and 14th crop cyclethan that of with purely inorganic source. Highest mean rice-equivalent system yieldwas obtained in the treatment with 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB (14.96 t ha-1). In contrast with the yield result, purely inorganic treatment showed better performance compare to all other organic and integrated treatments from the economical point of view during last two 13th and 14 th cropping year. The organic nutrient-management packages increased the mean soil organic carbon and soil macronutrients (available N, P and K) at the end of 13th and 14 th cropping system cycle over the control (fallow land) and the buildup was maximum in the soil, applied with 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB (0.98%, 301.8, 61.1 and 173.3 kg/ha for organic carbon, N, P and K). The mean microbial population after thirteenth and fourteenth cropping year in terms of colony forming units increased in a higher rate in soils with organic nutrient supply system (bacteria 3.7 to 14.5 cfu g-1, fungi 3 to 12.3 cfu g-1) compared to the control as against the respective increases of 1.2 cfu g-1 and 1.8 cfu g-1 in the soils receiving nutrients through chemical fertilizers. Application of 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB was the best organic nutrient management practice compare to other studied management practices for rice–potato–groundnut cropping system in new alluvial zone of West

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most organic and integrated treatments gave higher mean system yield than inorganic nutrient supply.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic and integrated treatmentse0
Outcome
mean system yield in terms of rice-equivalent yield (REY)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
purely inorganic sourcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most of the organic and integrated treatments showed significantly higher mean system yield in terms of rice-equivalent yield (REY) of the 13th and 14th crop cyclethan that of with purely inorganic source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–422 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined organic and microbial treatment had the highest mean system yield at 14.96 t ha-1.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSBe0
Outcome
mean rice-equivalent system yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
14.96 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest mean rice-equivalent system yieldwas obtained in the treatment with 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB (14.96 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic nutrient supply performed better economically than organic and integrated treatments.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
purely inorganic treatmente0
Outcome
better performancee0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
economical point of viewe0
Comparator
all other organic and integrated treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“purely inorganic treatment showed better performance compare to all other organic and integrated treatments from the economical point of view during last two 13th and 14 th cropping year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrient management increased mean soil organic carbon over fallow land.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic nutrient-management packagese0
Outcome
mean soil organic carbone0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control (fallow land)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic nutrient-management packages increased the mean soil organic carbon and soil macronutrients (available N, P and K) at the end of 13th and 14 th cropping system cycle over the control (fallow land) and the buildup was maximum in the soil, applied with 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB (0.98%, 301.8, 61.1 and 173.3 kg/ha for organic carbon, N, P and K).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrient management increased soil macronutrients (available N, P and K) over fallow land.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic nutrient-management packagese0
Outcome
soil macronutrients (available N, P and K)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control (fallow land)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic nutrient-management packages increased the mean soil organic carbon and soil macronutrients (available N, P and K) at the end of 13th and 14 th cropping system cycle over the control (fallow land) and the buildup was maximum in the soil, applied with 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB (0.98%, 301.8, 61.1 and 173.3 kg/ha for organic carbon, N, P and K).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced the maximum soil organic carbon buildup.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSBe0
Outcome
organic carbone0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic nutrient-management packages increased the mean soil organic carbon and soil macronutrients (available N, P and K) at the end of 13th and 14 th cropping system cycle over the control (fallow land) and the buildup was maximum in the soil, applied with 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB (0.98%, 301.8, 61.1 and 173.3 kg/ha for organic carbon, N, P and K).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced the maximum soil N buildup.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSBe0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
301.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic nutrient-management packages increased the mean soil organic carbon and soil macronutrients (available N, P and K) at the end of 13th and 14 th cropping system cycle over the control (fallow land) and the buildup was maximum in the soil, applied with 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB (0.98%, 301.8, 61.1 and 173.3 kg/ha for organic carbon, N, P and K).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced the maximum soil P buildup.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSBe0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
61.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic nutrient-management packages increased the mean soil organic carbon and soil macronutrients (available N, P and K) at the end of 13th and 14 th cropping system cycle over the control (fallow land) and the buildup was maximum in the soil, applied with 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB (0.98%, 301.8, 61.1 and 173.3 kg/ha for organic carbon, N, P and K).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced the maximum soil K buildup.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSBe0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
maximume0
Value
173.3 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic nutrient-management packages increased the mean soil organic carbon and soil macronutrients (available N, P and K) at the end of 13th and 14 th cropping system cycle over the control (fallow land) and the buildup was maximum in the soil, applied with 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB (0.98%, 301.8, 61.1 and 173.3 kg/ha for organic carbon, N, P and K).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrient supply increased soil bacteria counts more than chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic nutrient supply systeme0
Outcome
bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.7 to 14.5 cfu g-1e0
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean microbial population after thirteenth and fourteenth cropping year in terms of colony forming units increased in a higher rate in soils with organic nutrient supply system (bacteria 3.7 to 14.5 cfu g-1, fungi 3 to 12.3 cfu g-1) compared to the control as against the respective increases of 1.2 cfu g-1 and 1.8 cfu g-1 in the soils receiving nutrients through chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrient supply increased soil fungi counts more than chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic nutrient supply systeme0
Outcome
fungie0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3 to 12.3 cfu g-1e0
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean microbial population after thirteenth and fourteenth cropping year in terms of colony forming units increased in a higher rate in soils with organic nutrient supply system (bacteria 3.7 to 14.5 cfu g-1, fungi 3 to 12.3 cfu g-1) compared to the control as against the respective increases of 1.2 cfu g-1 and 1.8 cfu g-1 in the soils receiving nutrients through chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment was judged the best organic nutrient management practice.

Taxon
RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSBe0
Outcome
best organic nutrient management practicee0
Comparator
other studied management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 33% of recommended N each from FYM, vermicompost and Neem cake along with Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Rhizobium and PSB was the best organic nutrient management practice compare to other studied management practices for rice–potato–groundnut cropping system in new alluvial zone of West”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1999 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE (ORYZA SATIVA)-POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)-GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–180 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Azotobacter · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Azospirillum · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

botanical · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

208 papers: 193 positive, 15 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

204 papers more in this group

See all 208 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.