Paper · 2013 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Evaluation of integrated nutrient management onbororice in alluvial soil and its impacts upon growth, yield attributes, yield and soil nutrient status

Tapan Kumar Garai; Jayanta Kumar Datta; Naba Kumar Mondal

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted during 2009 to 2011 to study the effect of inorganic fertilizer, vermicompost, phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and Azotobacter on the yield of boro rice (winter rice) and its impacts upon soil nutrient status and grain uptake. The highest yield attributes were recorded with full recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer along with vermicompost at 2.5 t ha−1, PSB and Azotobacter, which was at par with 75% of inorganic fertilizer along with vermicompost at 2.5 t ha−1 and PSB and Azotobacter. Application of PSB and Azotobacter significantly increased available phosphorus and nitrogen in soil. Uptake of micronutrients in grain was in the order of Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu. Micronutrient status in soil was also significantly influenced by the different doses of inorganic, organic and biofertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full recommended inorganic fertilizer dose with vermicompost, PSB and Azotobacter gave the highest yield attributes.

Taxon
boro ricee1
Treatment
full recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer along with vermicompost at 2.5 t ha−1, PSB and Azotobactere0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield attributes were recorded with full recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer along with vermicompost at 2.5 t ha−1, PSB and Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–413 · show in text ↑
e1

“boro rice (winter rice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest treatment was at par with 75% inorganic fertilizer plus vermicompost, PSB and Azotobacter.

Taxon
boro ricee1
Outcome
at pare0
Comparator
75% of inorganic fertilizer along with vermicompost at 2.5 t ha−1 and PSB and Azotobactere0

Verbatim

e0

“which was at par with 75% of inorganic fertilizer along with vermicompost at 2.5 t ha−1 and PSB and Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–526 · show in text ↑
e1

“boro rice (winter rice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB and Azotobacter increased soil available phosphorus and nitrogen.

Taxon
boro ricee1
Treatment
Application of PSB and Azotobactere0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
available phosphorus and nitrogen in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of PSB and Azotobacter significantly increased available phosphorus and nitrogen in soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“boro rice (winter rice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain micronutrient uptake ranked Fe above Mn above Zn above Cu.

Taxon
boro ricee1
Outcome
Uptake of micronutrients in graine0

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of micronutrients in grain was in the order of Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–702 · show in text ↑
e1

“boro rice (winter rice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer doses significantly influenced soil micronutrient status.

Taxon
boro ricee1
Treatment
different doses of inorganic, organic and biofertilizerse0
Outcome
Micronutrient status in soile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient status in soil was also significantly influenced by the different doses of inorganic, organic and biofertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“boro rice (winter rice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–200 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Azotobacter · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

475 papers: 419 positive, 56 negative or no effect

418 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

471 papers more in this group

See all 475 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

35 papers: 35 positive, 0 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.