Abstract
The front line demonstrations were conducted at the farmers’ field to demonstrate the organic sources of nutrients for maintaining the soil health, reducing the rate of chemical fertilizer and to increase the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L). The demonstration was conducted at ten farmers’ field covering 6 ha. of land at RiBhoi District of Meghalaya during the year 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. The results of the study revealed that the application of Azospirillum @3.5kg/ha + PSB @3.5kg/ha + 30 kg of cow-dung by root dip treatment along with 50% recommended dose of chemical fertilizers had recorded significantly higher yield i.e. 45.72 q/ ha with B.C ratio of 2.43 followed by farmer’s practice (24.6 q/ha yield with B.C ratio 1.62). Moreover, the soil nutrient status was also improved at the time of harvesting as compared to farmer practice in both the years. An extension gap of 21.12 q/ ha and technology index 8.56 had been recorded.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management produced significantly higher rice yield of 45.72 q/ ha than farmer practice at 24.6 q/ha.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- application of Azospirillum @3.5kg/ha + PSB @3.5kg/ha + 30 kg of cow-dung by root dip treatment along with 50% recommended dose of chemical fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 45.72 q/ hae0
- Qualifier
- 24.6 q/hae0
- Comparator
- farmer’s practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results of the study revealed that the application of Azospirillum @3.5kg/ha + PSB @3.5kg/ha + 30 kg of cow-dung by root dip treatment along with 50% recommended dose of chemical fertilizers had recorded significantly higher yield i.e. 45.72 q/ ha with B.C ratio of 2.43 followed by farmer’s practice (24.6 q/ha yield with B.C ratio 1.62).”
t0“rice (Oryza Sativa l.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The integrated nutrient management treatment had a B.C ratio of 2.43 compared with 1.62 for farmer practice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- application of Azospirillum @3.5kg/ha + PSB @3.5kg/ha + 30 kg of cow-dung by root dip treatment along with 50% recommended dose of chemical fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- B.C ratioe0
- Value
- 2.43e0
- Qualifier
- 1.62e0
- Comparator
- farmer’s practicee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results of the study revealed that the application of Azospirillum @3.5kg/ha + PSB @3.5kg/ha + 30 kg of cow-dung by root dip treatment along with 50% recommended dose of chemical fertilizers had recorded significantly higher yield i.e. 45.72 q/ ha with B.C ratio of 2.43 followed by farmer’s practice (24.6 q/ha yield with B.C ratio 1.62).”
t0“rice (Oryza Sativa l.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil nutrient status improved at harvest under integrated nutrient management compared with farmer practice in both years.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Organ / stage
- harvestinge0
- Treatment
- application of Azospirillum @3.5kg/ha + PSB @3.5kg/ha + 30 kg of cow-dung by root dip treatment along with 50% recommended dose of chemical fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- soil nutrient statuse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- farmer practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Moreover, the soil nutrient status was also improved at the time of harvesting as compared to farmer practice in both the years.”
e1“The results of the study revealed that the application of Azospirillum @3.5kg/ha + PSB @3.5kg/ha + 30 kg of cow-dung by root dip treatment along with 50% recommended dose of chemical fertilizers had recorded significantly higher yield i.e. 45.72 q/ ha with B.C ratio of 2.43 followed by farmer’s practice (24.6 q/ha yield with B.C ratio 1.62).”
t0“rice (Oryza Sativa l.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The demonstration recorded an extension gap of 21.12 q/ ha.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- extension gape0
- Value
- 21.12 q/ hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An extension gap of 21.12 q/ ha and technology index 8.56 had been recorded.”
t0“rice (Oryza Sativa l.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The demonstration recorded a technology index of 8.56.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- technology indexe0
- Value
- 8.56e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An extension gap of 21.12 q/ ha and technology index 8.56 had been recorded.”
t0“rice (Oryza Sativa l.)”
The same questions in other papers
Azospirillum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Azospirillum · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
989 papers more in this group
See all 993 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.