Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Pruning during June promoting blueberry branches growth and Flower Buds formation

Yongdong Xie; Xiaoru Kang; Ji Liu; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract In this experiment, the growth status and flower bud differentiation of blueberry plants were studied after pruning the second or third buds at the top of the sprouting branches in the northern highbush blueberry cultivar ‘Brigitta’ in southwestern China. The results showed that there was no significant change in the content of ethylene among the five endogenous hormones, but top pruning had a significant effect on the content of the other four hormones, which indicated that top pruning could affect flower bud differentiation by regulating the content of endogenous hormones. The number of florets per panicle was significantly increased, which signified more fruits per panicle, and increased fruit yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Top pruning did not significantly change ethylene content.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
top pruninge1
Outcome
content of ethylenee0
Direction
no significant changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant change in the content of ethylene among the five endogenous hormones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“top pruning had a significant effect on the content of the other four hormones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Top pruning significantly affected the other four endogenous hormones.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
top pruninge0
Outcome
content of the other four hormonese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“top pruning had a significant effect on the content of the other four hormones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“top pruning had a significant effect on the content of the other four hormones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Top pruning significantly increased florets per panicle.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
top pruninge1
Outcome
number of florets per paniclee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The number of florets per panicle was significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“top pruning had a significant effect on the content of the other four hormones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report increased fruit yield following top pruning.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
top pruninge1
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“and increased fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“top pruning had a significant effect on the content of the other four hormones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–466 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · VacciniumResults differ

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

pruning · physiology: hormones · VacciniumResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.