Paper · 2021 · Journal of Crop production and processing

Photosynthetic Pigments Content and Grain Quality of Triticale as Affected by Mycorrhiza and Zeolite Enriched Manure Compost

Makvandi, M.; Bakhshandeh, A.; Khodaei joghan, A.; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In order to study the effect of mycorrhiza inoculation and zeolite-enriched manure compost on photosynthetic pigments content and qualitative properties of triticale grain, a factorial experiment in a completely randomized complete block design with four replications were conducted at Research Field of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan during 2016-2017 growing season. The experimental factors included mycorrhiza application at two levels (application and non-application of mycorrhiza), and mixing of zeolite to manure in six levels (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25% w/w of zeolite/manure). According to the results, under conditions of mycorrhiza application with increasing zeolite up to 15% leaf greenness index (SPAD) increased but decreased afterwards. The highest chlorophyll a (2.68 mg g-1) was obtained from 15% zeolite treatment and the lowest (1.82 mg g-1) was detected in control. Mycorrhiza inoculation caused a 14% increase in carotenoid content compared to non-inoculation. Grain phosphorus content (0.43 mg kg-1) was increased in mycorrhiza inoculation condition compared to non-inoculation (0.37 mg kg-1). Under inoculation conditions, the highest grain yield (3510.7 kg ha-1) belonged to application of 10% zeolite. Under non-inoculation condition more zeolite was needed (in compare to inoculation treatment) to obtain the highest grain yield. The highest protein yield (329.97 kg ha-1) was obtained from mycorrhiza inoculation treatment with 15% zeolite and the lowest protein yield (1152 kg ha-1) was obtained from mycorrhiza inoculation treatment with 25% zeolite. Finally, the results of this study showed that the application of zeolite in manure and inoculation of mycorrhiza fungi can increase the concentration of photosynthetic pigments and grain quality of triticale.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With mycorrhiza, leaf greenness rose as zeolite increased to 15%, then fell.

Taxon
Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
increasing zeolite up to 15%e0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
leaf greenness index (SPAD)e0
Direction
increased but decreased afterwardse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under conditions of mycorrhiza application with increasing zeolite up to 15% leaf greenness index (SPAD) increased but decreased afterwards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% zeolite treatment had the highest chlorophyll a, 2.68 mg g-1, versus 1.82 mg g-1 in control.

Taxon
Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
15% zeolite treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.68 mg g-1e0
Qualifier
1.82 mg g-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chlorophyll a (2.68 mg g-1) was obtained from 15% zeolite treatment and the lowest (1.82 mg g-1) was detected in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza inoculation increased carotenoid content by 14% compared with non-inoculation.

Taxon
Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
Mycorrhiza inoculatione0
Interactor
Mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
non-inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhiza inoculation caused a 14% increase in carotenoid content compared to non-inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza inoculation increased grain phosphorus content to 0.43 mg kg-1, versus 0.37 mg kg-1 without inoculation.

Taxon
Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
mycorrhiza inoculatione0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
Grain phosphorus contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.43 mg kg-1e0
Qualifier
0.37 mg kg-1e0
Comparator
non-inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain phosphorus content (0.43 mg kg-1) was increased in mycorrhiza inoculation condition compared to non-inoculation (0.37 mg kg-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under inoculation, 10% zeolite gave the highest grain yield, 3510.7 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
application of 10% zeolitee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3510.7 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under inoculation conditions, the highest grain yield (3510.7 kg ha-1) belonged to application of 10% zeolite.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without inoculation, more zeolite was needed to maximize grain yield than with inoculation.

Taxon
Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
non-inoculation conditione0
Outcome
zeolite was needede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
inoculation treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under non-inoculation condition more zeolite was needed (in compare to inoculation treatment) to obtain the highest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with 15% zeolite gave the highest protein yield, 329.97 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
mycorrhiza inoculation treatment with 15% zeolitee0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
329.97 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest protein yield (329.97 kg ha-1) was obtained from mycorrhiza inoculation treatment with 15% zeolite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with 25% zeolite gave the lowest reported protein yield, 1152 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
mycorrhiza inoculation treatment with 25% zeolitee0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1152 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest protein yield (1152 kg ha-1) was obtained from mycorrhiza inoculation treatment with 25% zeolite.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑

other · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · physiology: pigments · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.